General SQ General discussion of Sound Quality related issues.

B quiet Ultimate VS Dynamat Extreme

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-26-2005, 01:24 PM
  #1  
50 Watt CAFz'r
Thread Starter
 
Thrill_House's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 405
Post

I am about to make a large purchase of sound deadening and would like to know how well B quiet Ultimate stacks up against Dynamat Extreme. I dont only want to know how well it dampens but also how well it sticks to various surfaces and how well it stays adhered in different temperatures.
Thrill_House is offline  
Old 12-26-2005, 02:24 PM
  #2  
50 Watt CAFz'r
iTrader: (4)
 
fatty matty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 359
Post

I have installed copious amounts of both products in my car and IMO the B-Quiet is a better value. The Dynamat is a bit thicker and therefore I am assuming it dampens better than B-Quiet but probably not significantly more to justify to difference in price. The B-quiet and the Dynamat bond very well to the metal of the inside of my car and I have not had any problems with peeling in temperature ranges from +30 to -30 degrees. Dynamat had fewer air pockets to get rid of as compared to the B-Quiet, but I found the B-Quiet easier to cut into shape and it usually made a better fit in nooks and crannies.

My conclusion - buy at least twice as much B-Quiet as Dynamat for less $ and you will have beter sound dampening.
fatty matty is offline  
Old 12-26-2005, 03:18 PM
  #3  
50 Watt CAFz'r
Thread Starter
 
Thrill_House's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 405
Post

Originally posted by fatty matty:
I have installed copious amounts of both products in my car and IMO the B-Quiet is a better value. The Dynamat is a bit thicker and therefore I am assuming it dampens better than B-Quiet but probably not significantly more to justify to difference in price. The B-quiet and the Dynamat bond very well to the metal of the inside of my car and I have not had any problems with peeling in temperature ranges from +30 to -30 degrees. Dynamat had fewer air pockets to get rid of as compared to the B-Quiet, but I found the B-Quiet easier to cut into shape and it usually made a better fit in nooks and crannies.

My conclusion - buy at least twice as much B-Quiet as Dynamat for less $ and you will have beter sound dampening.
Thank you very much sir, that was quite informative for me. I am now going to go out and purchase 50 feet of the B Quiet Ultimate and hopefully cover the majority of the inside of my 1991 civic hatch.

[ December 26, 2005, 04:19 PM: Message edited by: Thrill_House ]
Thrill_House is offline  
Old 12-26-2005, 07:10 PM
  #4  
1000 Watt CAFz'r
iTrader: (1)
 
Westec's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,448
Post

The difference from the 2 sound deadners is 1 mm, you can but two layers of b-quiet for cheaper than 50 square feet of Dynamat.
Westec is offline  
Old 12-27-2005, 12:28 AM
  #5  
0 Watt CAFz'r
 
intensem1rider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 32
Post

Check this link out, it has informative tests and unbiased facts that you should definately take a peak into. I would definately say the B-Quiet Ultimate is the greatest buy/performance.
http://www.sounddeadenershowdown.com/
intensem1rider is offline  
Old 12-27-2005, 11:20 PM
  #6  
1000 Watt CAFz'r
iTrader: (1)
 
Westec's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,448
Post

Great link! It's great to see someone backing up their statements with facts!!!!!!!!!
Westec is offline  
Old 12-27-2005, 11:53 PM
  #7  
4000 Watt CAFz'r
iTrader: (7)
 
Prolifik's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 4,180
Post

sq guys....
Prolifik is offline  
Old 12-28-2005, 10:03 AM
  #8  
4000 Watt CAFz'r
iTrader: (5)
 
zzzzzzz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 4,643
Post

Originally posted by Westec:
The difference from the 2 sound deadners is 1 mm, you can but two layers of b-quiet for cheaper than 50 square feet of Dynamat.
i did d-mat and i would do b-quiet for the cost i could have 3 layers of bquiet and i would be happier
zzzzzzz is offline  
Old 12-28-2005, 12:46 PM
  #9  
1000 Watt CAFz'r
 
theboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,267
Post

Originally posted by Thrill_House:
</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by fatty matty:
I have installed copious amounts of both products in my car and IMO the B-Quiet is a better value. The Dynamat is a bit thicker and therefore I am assuming it dampens better than B-Quiet but probably not significantly more to justify to difference in price. The B-quiet and the Dynamat bond very well to the metal of the inside of my car and I have not had any problems with peeling in temperature ranges from +30 to -30 degrees. Dynamat had fewer air pockets to get rid of as compared to the B-Quiet, but I found the B-Quiet easier to cut into shape and it usually made a better fit in nooks and crannies.

My conclusion - buy at least twice as much B-Quiet as Dynamat for less $ and you will have beter sound dampening.
Thank you very much sir, that was quite informative for me. I am now going to go out and purchase 50 feet of the B Quiet Ultimate and hopefully cover the majority of the inside of my 1991 civic hatch. </font>[/QUOTE]I thought you said a large purchase....buy 2 rolls of the website and double it up.Its on sale right now!
theboy is offline  
Old 12-30-2005, 08:58 PM
  #10  
50 Watt CAFz'r
 
strappingyounglad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 237
Post

I've had good experiences with B-uiet Extreme, but I've never used the Ultimate, or Dynamat for that matter. Dynamat is just too expensive to even think about buying it. Maybe if you had lots of cash to spend it would be worth the extra money, but otherwise, I doubt it...
strappingyounglad is offline  


Quick Reply: B quiet Ultimate VS Dynamat Extreme



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:24 AM.