General Discussion General discussion about all things car audio, from pioneer, orion, alpine and eclipse.

Explain this would ya?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-02-2008, 04:46 AM
  #31  
50 Watt CAFz'r
Thread Starter
 
Gearstix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 135
Originally Posted by effenay
Back on topic, Digital Designs recommends wire nuts for connecting the subwoofer leads. Yes, the same wire nuts that you use for household electrical. Personally I would solder and shrinkwrap, but hey, if it's good enough for DD...

More info from DD

Ahh there called marrettes aswell.. I have a backload at my house..
Lol I can't believe I never checked DD's site..
I think I froze my brain yesterday.
Gearstix is offline  
Old 02-02-2008, 07:35 AM
  #32  
500 Watt CAFz'r
iTrader: (1)
 
liv2ride's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 668
God I love those DD's, I should of bought one from jordy when I had the chance Those dust caps are teh sexy This was a good question !

oh and super off topic, but to answer somebodys question, the contact number is the last 4 digits of your phone number..
liv2ride is offline  
Old 02-02-2008, 09:01 AM
  #33  
--SPECIAL ED--
iTrader: (3)
 
PsychoAcoustics Canada's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 2,364
im not a fan of using marettes on sub wires, id rather braid and tape. And matt your ford may have a wall but its still a ford
PsychoAcoustics Canada is offline  
Old 02-02-2008, 12:24 PM
  #34  
1000 Watt CAFz'r
iTrader: (1)
 
sx4life's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,832
fORD LOL
sx4life is offline  
Old 02-02-2008, 01:55 PM
  #35  
4000 Watt CAFz'r
iTrader: (3)
 
Haunz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 4,218
I think the wires are kind of ghetto.....

I'd rather have heavy duty spring terminals....
Haunz is offline  
Old 02-02-2008, 02:43 PM
  #36  
4000 Watt CAFz'r
iTrader: (5)
 
zzzzzzz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 4,643
Originally Posted by Haunz
I think the wires are kind of ghetto.....

I'd rather have heavy duty spring terminals....
yes but you need to be a bit ghetto for spl

what does it say when i mite set up a car for it ?
zzzzzzz is offline  
Old 02-02-2008, 03:08 PM
  #37  
DJL
0 Watt CAFz'r
 
DJL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 14
Speaker terminals are one of the weakest links in the voice coil to amplifier chain of connections. They are used because they are very cheap in cost (less than 15 cents a pair) and you can get a lot of bling on them. Most manufacturers use them for that reason.

They are easy to break off, have very little surface contact and little if any copper in them. Most are made of steel with a VERY thin plating of tin, chrome or some other flashy material with not the best of conducting qualitiy. Voice coils are not made of steel for a very good reason....why should an electrical connection be made of it.

Copper to copper is the best connection there is. That's why we use the direct connection lead system on DD/AQ subwoofers. We pay far more for those "ghetto" lead in wires because it works the best and that's all we worry about.

There is a reason why so many now copy our method.
DJL is offline  
Old 02-02-2008, 03:30 PM
  #38  
50 Watt CAFz'r
 
Smoke_31's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 478
Originally Posted by DJL
Speaker terminals are one of the weakest links in the voice coil to amplifier chain of connections. They are used because they are very cheap in cost (less than 15 cents a pair) and you can get a lot of bling on them. Most manufacturers use them for that reason.

They are easy to break off, have very little surface contact and little if any copper in them. Most are made of steel with a VERY thin plating of tin, chrome or some other flashy material with not the best of conducting qualitiy. Voice coils are not made of steel for a very good reason....why should an electrical connection be made of it.

Copper to copper is the best connection there is. That's why we use the direct connection lead system on DD/AQ subwoofers. We pay far more for those "ghetto" lead in wires because it works the best and that's all we worry about.

There is a reason why so many now copy our method.
Lol. Well put and a very spirited arguement!
Smoke_31 is offline  
Old 02-02-2008, 03:30 PM
  #39  
4000 Watt CAFz'r
iTrader: (3)
 
Haunz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 4,218
Originally Posted by DJL
Speaker terminals are one of the weakest links in the voice coil to amplifier chain of connections. They are used because they are very cheap in cost (less than 15 cents a pair) and you can get a lot of bling on them. Most manufacturers use them for that reason.

They are easy to break off, have very little surface contact and little if any copper in them. Most are made of steel with a VERY thin plating of tin, chrome or some other flashy material with not the best of conducting qualitiy. Voice coils are not made of steel for a very good reason....why should an electrical connection be made of it.

Copper to copper is the best connection there is. That's why we use the direct connection lead system on DD/AQ subwoofers. We pay far more for those "ghetto" lead in wires because it works the best and that's all we worry about.

There is a reason why so many now copy our method.
I fail to see how wrapping two wires together is any better then a spring termial connection... and if there is any difference I can assure you it will be completely neglegable....

if you think the wire makes a difference over spring loaded termials you should look into having the voice coil leads welded directly to the wire... cause aluminum tinsel leads along with tin solder is the weakest link in the voice coil to amplifier chain....



Last edited by Haunz; 02-02-2008 at 03:40 PM.
Haunz is offline  
Old 02-02-2008, 03:36 PM
  #40  
4000 Watt CAFz'r
iTrader: (5)
 
zzzzzzz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 4,643
Originally Posted by DJL
There is a reason why so many now copy our method.
ok i need to ask who are you
zzzzzzz is offline  


Quick Reply: Explain this would ya?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:26 AM.