General Discussion General discussion about all things car audio, from pioneer, orion, alpine and eclipse.

Focal advice

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-28-2008, 07:55 PM
  #1  
0 Watt CAFz'r
Thread Starter
 
rlspence's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 9
Focal advice

Hi,just bought some 165 K2P's to replace my 165 vrs slims.I have been powering the Focals with a Alpine MRP-F550 -250 watts bridged at 4 ohms. I have been told this is an entry level amp. and not up to the task of powering the K2P'S.Have Eclipse 7200 and Focal 27 KX as HU and sub. Opinions or suggestions if the amp.isn't up to the task.I'm NOT looking for loud-just very high quality SQ.Thanks.
rlspence is offline  
Old 12-28-2008, 08:10 PM
  #2  
4000 Watt CAFz'r
iTrader: (66)
 
MR2NR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 6,420
It is not a bad amp at all. There is a deal on the Eclipse ICEpower Class D XA2000 right now. It would be a amp to short list if you want more power and a upgrade.
MR2NR is offline  
Old 12-28-2008, 08:11 PM
  #3  
2000 Watt CAFz'r
iTrader: (11)
 
avidedtr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 2,544
not a fan of alpine amps on focals . Audison makes a good stereo LRx Amps. the 2.4 is quite powerfull or you can go up to the 2.9 very strong and reliable amps!
avidedtr is offline  
Old 12-30-2008, 01:37 PM
  #4  
500 Watt CAFz'r
iTrader: (1)
 
loudtdi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 628
Originally Posted by rlspence
Hi,just bought some 165 K2P's to replace my 165 vrs slims.I have been powering the Focals with a Alpine MRP-F550 -250 watts bridged at 4 ohms. I have been told this is an entry level amp. and not up to the task of powering the K2P'S.Have Eclipse 7200 and Focal 27 KX as HU and sub. Opinions or suggestions if the amp.isn't up to the task.I'm NOT looking for loud-just very high quality SQ.Thanks.

The Alpine amp sounds like it would be up to the task, but if you want more power the K2Ps will appreciate the headroom. I would definately stick with a class AB amplifier for the components.

A higher powered 2 channel and dedicated mono amplifier would be a nice upgrade.

Focal has a few amps that would also work for your application. www.focal-america.com

Last edited by loudtdi; 12-30-2008 at 01:41 PM.
loudtdi is offline  
Old 12-30-2008, 04:23 PM
  #5  
500 Watt CAFz'r
iTrader: (1)
 
Denonite's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 968
you're giving them 250 rms per side...how much more do you think the Focals need to sound "better"? Honestly, you won't get better SQ with any other amp, this goes back to the same old amp debate as always(all amps sound the same ala Richard Clark). If you want a different sound, you're better off getting an eq, as any other amp that sounds different will just be "eq'ing" the signal in some way. Better SQ is more a function of installation (positioning) and tuning than amplifier brand or model.
Denonite is offline  
Old 12-30-2008, 04:34 PM
  #6  
2000 Watt CAFz'r
iTrader: (11)
 
avidedtr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 2,544
Originally Posted by Denonite
you're giving them 250 rms per side...how much more do you think the Focals need to sound "better"? Honestly, you won't get better SQ with any other amp, this goes back to the same old amp debate as always(all amps sound the same ala Richard Clark). If you want a different sound, you're better off getting an eq, as any other amp that sounds different will just be "eq'ing" the signal in some way. Better SQ is more a function of installation (positioning) and tuning than amplifier brand or model.
Now thats a load of BS but hey - my ears didn't lie when once I moved from Alpine to Audison.

-Midrange was full and detailed compared to spaced out and unfocused
-Treble was smooth compared to grity and harsh
-Sub bass is dynamic and accurate compared too boomy and lacking
avidedtr is offline  
Old 12-30-2008, 04:52 PM
  #7  
500 Watt CAFz'r
iTrader: (1)
 
Denonite's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 968
^^isn't that what they all say, but can't proove...anyway, not my money, so knock yourself out!
Denonite is offline  
Old 12-30-2008, 04:54 PM
  #8  
50 Watt CAFz'r
 
Adnan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 207
what do you guys think of the rockford 400-4/600-4 amps running
these components?
Adnan is offline  
Old 12-30-2008, 04:58 PM
  #9  
2000 Watt CAFz'r
iTrader: (11)
 
avidedtr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 2,544
Originally Posted by Denonite
^^isn't that what they all say, but can't proove...anyway, not my money, so knock yourself out!
I'm not going to get into a debate with you but not all amps sound the same. Ten years ago when I worked for a shop I used to A/B between PPI art series and Soundstream Class A amps and there was a difference!

And no it's not your money but you ears will only be suffering!
avidedtr is offline  
Old 12-30-2008, 05:10 PM
  #10  
500 Watt CAFz'r
iTrader: (1)
 
Denonite's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 968
same argument everybody else uses but can't seem to hear it when they are put in a controlled test. Anyway, like I said...not my money!
Denonite is offline  


Quick Reply: Focal advice



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:20 AM.