General Discussion General discussion about all things car audio, from pioneer, orion, alpine and eclipse.

Kicker 04SX600.2 VS. Rockford P6002

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-02-2007, 02:30 PM
  #1  
0 Watt CAFz'r
Thread Starter
 
Evanb's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 29
Kicker 04SX600.2 VS. Rockford P6002

I have both these amps, just sitting here. Need to get rid of one to buy some subs. Which is a better amp?


Links


Kicker

http://caraudiosecurity.com/shop/product/products_id/3316.html

Rockford

http://www.rockfordfosgate.com/products/product_details.asp?cat_id=2&series_id=6&family_id =20&item_id=91285&locale=en_US&p_status=


Thanks
Evanb is offline  
Old 02-02-2007, 04:25 PM
  #2  
1000 Watt CAFz'r
iTrader: (1)
 
zinger002's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,445
i herd from the guy at visions kicker rates their amps in rms where as rf rates as max power, but idn if its true or not, someone clairify please... but...
based on what the sales person said the kicker would put out more then the rf.
zinger002 is offline  
Old 02-02-2007, 04:40 PM
  #3  
50 Watt CAFz'r
iTrader: (7)
 
rmorris003's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 289
yep, i worked at future shop and they told me to buy the mtx over the rf amps cause they put out more
rmorris003 is offline  
Old 02-02-2007, 05:19 PM
  #4  
50 Watt CAFz'r
 
jasondh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 74
I'd keep the Kicker based solely on the flexability of the DSP.
jasondh is offline  
Old 02-04-2007, 10:40 AM
  #5  
--SPECIAL ED--
iTrader: (9)
 
Ross's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 82
Yup, Kicker all the way... the SX series is something else... but if you don't really need the DSP of the SX... the KX650.4 is same power output at a much lower price point... they change he look for 2006/07 and renamed the KX650.4 to the ZX650.4 btw
Ross is offline  




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:48 AM.