General Discussion General discussion about all things car audio, from pioneer, orion, alpine and eclipse.

Long port vs less port area

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-07-2010, 10:47 AM
  #11  
--SPECIAL ED--
 
JDN1014's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 138
i play wayy under tunning quite often without blowing subs only time i blew a sub was from a bad glue joint. now.. if it was for pure SPL yes.. playing under tunning would blow them , daily not so much IMO
JDN1014 is offline  
Old 11-07-2010, 11:01 AM
  #12  
Moderator

iTrader: (2)
 
wasted911's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,285
here are WAY too many factors in that equation. If you want to make it louder. Buy a louder car. Same excursion, same power.

but really there's things like cancellation between the port and sub as well as standing waves etc.
wasted911 is offline  
Old 11-07-2010, 11:17 AM
  #13  
1000 Watt CAFz'r
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
Lord Huggington's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,462
Enough power to get the most out of it without it dying, so something like 3-5K. Who knows if it'll mechanically/thermally handle that. 250-350A alt + 3 batteries .

Is 3 cubes too much when they recommend 1.7-2.5? That box is asthetically perfect for my cabin-trunk opening - 2" spacing on 3 dimensions, and takes up the entire "throw-in-box" area. I was lucky that it came out as 3 @ 31. Wanna wall it off.

How are the leads on the 2010 BTL's?

When my XXX was working it was in 2.2 @ 36, one day I had forgotten that I had a 20 HZ tone as song #1 on a burned CD, and it was cranked. The sub looked like it was going to jump out of the box but holy cow was it ever a loud 20 HZ. With stock electrical my amp must have not been putting out anywhere near 1500W because 20HZ sounded louder (as in sounded AND actually) than 36-42 HZ tones. I guess that's when xmax > power?
Lord Huggington is offline  
Old 11-07-2010, 08:28 PM
  #14  
MTA
2000 Watt CAFz'r
iTrader: (1)
 
MTA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 2,282
Originally Posted by JDN1014
i play wayy under tunning quite often without blowing subs only time i blew a sub was from a bad glue joint. now.. if it was for pure SPL yes.. playing under tunning would blow them , daily not so much IMO
im not going to say it...
daily blows subs just as easily as SPL ... in SPL you are using only a few frequencies +/- your center frequency... chances of blowing your sub are much lower than daily where you need to reproduce a wide range of bass frequencies.( im not talking about SPL overpowering at this moment, where you play 3+ times the subwoofers power handling)


do some research on subwoofer enclosures . and read ALOT
MTA is offline  
Old 11-07-2010, 09:59 PM
  #15  
--SPECIAL ED--
 
JDN1014's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 138
im sure alot has to do with box design yes
JDN1014 is offline  
Old 11-07-2010, 10:17 PM
  #16  
Administrator
 
Dukk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 16,855
Increase your tuning to 35-38hz. How does your vent length look now? If it's still too long, roll back to 38-40 sqin and see how that looks.
Dukk is offline  
Old 11-07-2010, 10:44 PM
  #17  
Guest
 
Mach5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 216
Originally Posted by DeadlySones


More Xmax a sub travels equals higher impedance and therefore amp will produce less power....
Actually is quite the opposite, further the coil is out the gap, lower the back-emf thus higher current and lower impedance, until you heat up the coil enough to increase the Re.
Mach5 is offline  
Old 11-07-2010, 11:55 PM
  #18  
1000 Watt CAFz'r
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
Lord Huggington's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,462
Originally Posted by Dukk
Increase your tuning to 35-38hz. How does your vent length look now? If it's still too long, roll back to 38-40 sqin and see how that looks.
What is "too long"? You can either have more port area or a shorter port - do I have to model them or is there a guideline to which is better?

Does the port lose force when it's long?
Lord Huggington is offline  
Old 11-08-2010, 12:14 AM
  #19  
1000 Watt CAFz'r
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
Lord Huggington's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,462
3 cubes each

Port 3.5 W x 12.5 H x 27.25 D
34.66 HZ

Port width 3.25 W x 12.5 H x 27.375 D
33.44 HZ

Port width 3 W x 12.5 H x 27.5 D
32.16 HZ

I like my box moar.
Lord Huggington is offline  
Old 11-08-2010, 02:18 PM
  #20  
Administrator
 
Dukk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 16,855
You were the one saying the port was really long. You tell me what's too long..

IMO 53 sqin looks like too much vent.
Dukk is offline  


Quick Reply: Long port vs less port area



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:10 AM.