MP3's vs. original recording SQ??
#1
MP3's vs. original recording SQ??
I've had my system in my car for a while however last night for the first time I put in an original CD rather than a MP3 loaded home made CD...
I have to say that the different was a LOT more than just barely noticeable. It sounds like the front stage is 12" higher, the subs are crisper and basically sounds like a totally new system.
Can this be? I figured that there would be a difference, but this much?
The MP3's were recorded from my own CD's @ 128 bit rate...
I have to say that the different was a LOT more than just barely noticeable. It sounds like the front stage is 12" higher, the subs are crisper and basically sounds like a totally new system.
Can this be? I figured that there would be a difference, but this much?
The MP3's were recorded from my own CD's @ 128 bit rate...
#2
Originally Posted by tonez735
Can this be? I figured that there would be a difference, but this much? The MP3's were recorded from my own CD's @ 128 bit rate...
#6
Originally Posted by syang3
I find 256kbps is a perfect balance between SQ and file size for me. Can't hear much difference between this and original CD on my system. However to be safe 320kbps is what I normally do. Hope that helps.
#8
well..... i find the difference usually lies in the richness of the recording, from about 500hz and down. With the MP3.. there're less tone colours and dynamics. it depends on the music you listen to tho.. cause its most critical with acoustic instruments like in the lower octaves of gitars, piano, cello, etc. and not as bad on electronic synthesizers based instruments.
the top end in some case is actually more open or airy from the mp3. but CD isn't perfect either..
the top end in some case is actually more open or airy from the mp3. but CD isn't perfect either..
Last edited by SweetnLow91SC; 02-14-2007 at 11:59 AM.