General Discussion General discussion about all things car audio, from pioneer, orion, alpine and eclipse.

MP3's vs. original recording SQ??

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-14-2007, 10:11 AM
  #1  
50 Watt CAFz'r
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
tonez735's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 374
MP3's vs. original recording SQ??

I've had my system in my car for a while however last night for the first time I put in an original CD rather than a MP3 loaded home made CD...

I have to say that the different was a LOT more than just barely noticeable. It sounds like the front stage is 12" higher, the subs are crisper and basically sounds like a totally new system.

Can this be? I figured that there would be a difference, but this much?

The MP3's were recorded from my own CD's @ 128 bit rate...
tonez735 is offline  
Old 02-14-2007, 10:14 AM
  #2  
500 Watt CAFz'r
 
Rockney's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 609
Originally Posted by tonez735
Can this be? I figured that there would be a difference, but this much? The MP3's were recorded from my own CD's @ 128 bit rate...
Your Bitrate is way to low for amplified reproduction.. My MP3's are all 320kbps. I ran into the exact same issue DJ'ing when first switching over to digital..
Rockney is offline  
Old 02-14-2007, 10:19 AM
  #3  
500 Watt CAFz'r
iTrader: (1)
 
liv2ride's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 668
128kb/s lol.. omg, that is low.. even 192 is border line
liv2ride is offline  
Old 02-14-2007, 10:23 AM
  #4  
50 Watt CAFz'r
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
tonez735's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 374
LOL thanks guys.
tonez735 is offline  
Old 02-14-2007, 10:58 AM
  #5  
50 Watt CAFz'r
 
syang3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 107
I find 256kbps is a perfect balance between SQ and file size for me. Can't hear much difference between this and original CD on my system. However to be safe 320kbps is what I normally do. Hope that helps.
syang3 is offline  
Old 02-14-2007, 11:22 AM
  #6  
4000 Watt CAFz'r
iTrader: (5)
 
zzzzzzz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 4,643
Originally Posted by syang3
I find 256kbps is a perfect balance between SQ and file size for me. Can't hear much difference between this and original CD on my system. However to be safe 320kbps is what I normally do. Hope that helps.
SQ over file size for me 320 but i like my cd's
zzzzzzz is offline  
Old 02-14-2007, 11:24 AM
  #7  
500 Watt CAFz'r
iTrader: (4)
 
boombox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 630
dvd is the best then original cd > burn CD tape is still better than MP3 but I would stick with a higher bit rate when burning CD for the car
boombox is offline  
Old 02-14-2007, 11:45 AM
  #8  
500 Watt CAFz'r
 
SweetnLow91SC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 884
well..... i find the difference usually lies in the richness of the recording, from about 500hz and down. With the MP3.. there're less tone colours and dynamics. it depends on the music you listen to tho.. cause its most critical with acoustic instruments like in the lower octaves of gitars, piano, cello, etc. and not as bad on electronic synthesizers based instruments.

the top end in some case is actually more open or airy from the mp3. but CD isn't perfect either..

Last edited by SweetnLow91SC; 02-14-2007 at 11:59 AM.
SweetnLow91SC is offline  
Old 02-14-2007, 12:29 PM
  #9  
50 Watt CAFz'r
iTrader: (1)
 
DesolataX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 379
Get an 80GB ipod video and an ipod compatible deck (not aux in), rip everything as lossless m4a.
Only way to go if you don't want to carry around all those cd's.
DesolataX is offline  
Old 02-14-2007, 01:32 PM
  #10  
50 Watt CAFz'r
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
tonez735's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 374
Does anyone here know off the top of their head if the Eclipse 8445 is ipod ready? I think it is but I can't recall for sure.
tonez735 is offline  


Quick Reply: MP3's vs. original recording SQ??



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:14 PM.