Stroker II??

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

Search this Thread

Jan 7, 2004 | 09:17 AM

#21

Dereck Waller

Guest

Posts: n/a

Also, it looks tome like most of the parts were custom for that sub which actually would make it more expensive to makethan some of these parts r us subs I see lately.

Jan 7, 2004 | 12:56 PM

#22

Dave MacKinnon

Guest

Posts: n/a

I'd rather have a single high-strength magnet (ie: one that was magnetized well) than a bunch of really geavy average ones.. I always though the Stroker was cool, So did Chase, 20Hz and Fast Forward..

Jan 8, 2004 | 01:55 PM

#23

ShYYLO

1000 Watt CAFz'r

Joined: Sep 2002

Posts: 1,093

Hey, I wanna Stroker II !!!

SHY

Jan 8, 2004 | 03:32 PM

#24

Perfecttones - Paul

500 Watt CAFz'r

Joined: Jan 2001

Posts: 901

Yea some of us have played with Strokers and really loved the results, the only problem I have with the sub is the cones were never made for the enormous power that companys are making right now remember the Stroker dates back to the 70's. I agree with Tom that the parts werent that expensive, but most companys nowadays do not use expensive parts, mostly mass produce. CV just needs to make the cones take the power that is available without losing efficiency, and make coils that are usable like dual .5 or 1ohm and they will have a sure winner