Two 12" IDQ's vs Two 12" JLW6's
What are your thoughts people? SQL-wise
-Ported box, 3 cubes, 25 hz -Powered by Arc Audio KAR 900.1 at 2 ohms = 750 wrms with subsonic filter crossed at around 80 hz with 12 db slope -Hatchback Thanks in advance p.s. I believe each IDQ is around 400 wrms, and each JLW6 is around 500 wrms. |
Which version IDQ and W6? V.2's?
3 cubes each or total? |
If it's the W6V2, that would be my vote. Really one of the better sounding drivers out there.
|
Originally Posted by tristanxoxo
Which version IDQ and W6? V.2's?
3 cubes each or total? All latest versions, three cubes total. |
very pleased with my 10" w6v2
|
Originally Posted by Ligeia
If it's the W6V2, that would be my vote. Really one of the better sounding drivers out there.
If you meant the IDQ v.3's, I have no idea...never used them. |
Looks like JL is in the lead...
|
It's a landslide!!!
|
If you are looking solely for ouput then the JL will win, but for SQ properties, tonality, and compliance the IDQ will definetly take the JL. Also 2 IDQ 12's would not like 3 cubes sealed, and 3 cubes ported is a little on the large side. The JL's on the otherhand will like 3 cubes.
My 2 cents |
Originally Posted by PerfectTones-Chris
If you are looking solely for ouput then the JL will win, but for SQ properties, tonality, and compliance the IDQ will definetly take the JL. Also 2 IDQ 12's would not like 3 cubes sealed, and 3 cubes ported is a little on the large side. The JL's on the otherhand will like 3 cubes.
My 2 cents While I agree 3 cubes sealed may be a bit large for the IDQ v.2's, 3 cubes ported @ 19-29Hz would work very well. I'm a bit surprised about your thoughts on the W6v.2's...you make it almost sound like a driver designed for SPL. IMO, they are more geared towards SQ than SPL output. |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:20 PM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands