Alpine CDA-9887 Apple Lossless vs CD
Howdy,
I have an Alpine CDA-9887 with an iPod connected via "Full Speed" USB.
According to a rep at Alpine, the iPod sends a digital signal over USB to the deck, and then the deck's 24bit Burr-Brown DACs D/A it.
According to Apple, Apple Lossless, which is part of the MP4 AAC-LC spec, should be identical to the digital source.
So here's the weird thing.
When I A/B the same song from a retail CD and the Lossless file that was ripped from that very CD, there is a noticeable difference. I've had other people listen and they agree. The CD sounds cleaner and more defined.
So, my question is this. (Bracing for guesses and conjecture and opinions)
Is there a difference because:
1- Apple Lossless isn't really lossless.
2- The iPod decodes all audio into PCM, badly, and sends that.
3- Someone is lying and the iPod's crappy DAC is doing the D/A and sending analogue.
4- I'm hearing things
Thanks!
-Drunkenrobot
I have an Alpine CDA-9887 with an iPod connected via "Full Speed" USB.
According to a rep at Alpine, the iPod sends a digital signal over USB to the deck, and then the deck's 24bit Burr-Brown DACs D/A it.
According to Apple, Apple Lossless, which is part of the MP4 AAC-LC spec, should be identical to the digital source.
So here's the weird thing.
When I A/B the same song from a retail CD and the Lossless file that was ripped from that very CD, there is a noticeable difference. I've had other people listen and they agree. The CD sounds cleaner and more defined.
So, my question is this. (Bracing for guesses and conjecture and opinions)
Is there a difference because:
1- Apple Lossless isn't really lossless.
2- The iPod decodes all audio into PCM, badly, and sends that.
3- Someone is lying and the iPod's crappy DAC is doing the D/A and sending analogue.
4- I'm hearing things
Thanks!
-Drunkenrobot
So, there is a possibility that the ECC ripper in iTunes introduced artifacts into the Lossless file... I will re-rip the CD with EAC and transcode it to Apple Lossless and have another listen. Maybe that's the issue. Thanks!
...and unless you do a proper abx test with the two, you can't be sure you're actually hearing a difference, or if it's psychoacoustics playing tricks...same old story. Anyway, if you feel one sounds better, then by all means use what you like better...if your mind tells you one sounds better, who cares what anyone else says!
Yeah. That's why I was wondering if I was hearing things! :-)
I wish it wasn't so hard to do a double blind.
I also wish I could find out if the iPod was sending PCM or straight encoded data.
Is the deck decoding the audio to PCM for the DAC or is the iPod decoding PCM for the DAC?
I wish it wasn't so hard to do a double blind.
I also wish I could find out if the iPod was sending PCM or straight encoded data.
Is the deck decoding the audio to PCM for the DAC or is the iPod decoding PCM for the DAC?
Yeah. That's why I was wondering if I was hearing things! :-)
I wish it wasn't so hard to do a double blind.
I also wish I could find out if the iPod was sending PCM or straight encoded data.
Is the deck decoding the audio to PCM for the DAC or is the iPod decoding PCM for the DAC?
I wish it wasn't so hard to do a double blind.
I also wish I could find out if the iPod was sending PCM or straight encoded data.
Is the deck decoding the audio to PCM for the DAC or is the iPod decoding PCM for the DAC?
I REALIZED YOU HAVE A 9887 WITH A 422i CABLE..THAT SYSTEM WAS ANALOG AS FAR AS I RECALL, IT OFFERED HIGH SPEED FILE SEARCH AND DOWNLOAD, BUT THE OUTPUT WAS ANALOG. THE NEW DECKS USING THE 440i CABLE LIKE THE CDA 117 ARE PURE DIGITAL, SO THE DIFFERENCE YOU HEAR IS PROBABLY CORRECT.
check this thread out for more info specific to the high speed cable:
http://www.diymobileaudio.com/forum/member-reviews-product-comparisons/30884-alpine-cda-9887-full-speed-connection-analog-digital.html
Last edited by Denonite; Aug 25, 2011 at 05:43 PM.
Hmm. Good point. It may be just a level thing. The cd is certainly much much louder, and I have to turn the sub down quite a bit, relatively. I'll try ripping the test track again with EAC and re-encode it and see how it comes out.



