Car Audio Forumz - The #1 Car Audio Forum

Car Audio Forumz - The #1 Car Audio Forum (https://www.caraudioforumz.com/)
-   General SQ (https://www.caraudioforumz.com/general-sq-15/)
-   -   Two tens vs. 4 eights?? (https://www.caraudioforumz.com/general-sq-15/two-tens-vs-4-eights-7502/)

fatty matty 08-07-2005 09:56 PM

I just installed 2 Kenwood Excelon KFC-XW1025dB's in a sealed box and have them running off of a JL 500/1 and I have to say I am a bit dissapointed with both the SQL and SPL. The subs hit only moderately hard and sound a bit muddy. I had good experiences with the Memphis M-Class 12 inch subs for SQL purposes so I am wondering if anyone has any ideas on how 4 eight inch M-Class Memphis subs would sound compared to the 2 Kenwoods.

I am also considering swapping the Kenwoods for 2 of the Memphis 10 inch subs (the Memphis subs are a lot TIGHTER than the Kenwoods)!

Thanks!

Hardwrkr 08-08-2005 04:26 AM

Try a ported enclosure. If you don't have the airspace to port two tens then consider a single 12" sub capable of higher output and matching the 500/1 and run it ported.

Thrill_House 08-08-2005 10:56 AM

I am also going to have to say go with a 12, you are going to be hard pressed to get the same low frequency extension out of a 10 or especially an 8. I am actually getting rid of the 2 10's in my car in favour of a single 12 for SQ purposes.

Paul Niwranski 08-08-2005 01:04 PM


Originally posted by Thrill_House:
I am also going to have to say go with a 12, you are going to be hard pressed to get the same low frequency extension out of a 10 or especially an 8. I am actually getting rid of the 2 10's in my car in favour of a single 12 for SQ purposes.
Your 2 10s have more cone area. More cone area = more bottom end.

Thrill_House 08-08-2005 01:31 PM


Originally posted by Dukk:
</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by Thrill_House:
I am also going to have to say go with a 12, you are going to be hard pressed to get the same low frequency extension out of a 10 or especially an 8. I am actually getting rid of the 2 10's in my car in favour of a single 12 for SQ purposes.

Your 2 10s have more cone area. More cone area = more bottom end. </font>[/QUOTE]My tens are very punchy and can get plenty loud but just they just dont have the greatest externsion in the lower frequency range, and as I compete in IASCA I real need an even response throught the sub frequency range.

Thrill_House 08-08-2005 01:31 PM

Oh yeah and also my two tens dont have alot of cone area due to the oversized surround.

fatty matty 08-08-2005 09:40 PM

Well, after more tweeking (I spend too many waking hours of my life tweeking amps) the two 10 inch Kenwoods are sounding better. I still think I will try four eight inch subs one day just to see how it sounds. I think I will have more surface area than with the two tens and I might get a better quality response between 60-80 Hz. Thanks for the input.

WeDgE 08-09-2005 09:40 PM


Originally posted by Dukk:
Your 2 10s have more cone area. More cone area = more bottom end.
No, more displacement = more bottom end. [img]smile.gif[/img]

Starterwiz 08-09-2005 11:31 PM

Lower Fb = more bottom end.
Cone area and displacement = more SPL.
It's the sub/box design that produces SQ.

Paul Niwranski 08-10-2005 01:06 PM

For a given power and similar woofers, two 10s will have more cone area, more displacement, more output, more bottom end, better SQ, and take up more room than a single 12.

does that satisfy all the smarties? [img]graemlins/boring.gif[/img]


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:59 PM.


© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands