Would YOU buy this amp??
12-02-2004, 01:53 PM
#1
I know some people on here says that spelling and grammer don't mean anything.
So I'm wondering... would YOU buy this amp?
I mean, c'mon. Who can't spell the word "or" ? [img]graemlins/laugh.gif[/img]
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll...735467784&rd=1
So I'm wondering... would YOU buy this amp?
I mean, c'mon. Who can't spell the word "or" ? [img]graemlins/laugh.gif[/img]
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll...735467784&rd=1
12-02-2004, 02:08 PM
#2
"doul voice coil subs bridged the amp done a fine job "
"if you are locking"
"it was mad to be 25 watts at 12 volts and 2500 at 13 volts" hmm...so it does 100x its power with an extra volt? ...lol
" ferrand cap ore two " Dang! My opinion about lumina kid's spelling has changed drastically.
"if you are locking"
"it was mad to be 25 watts at 12 volts and 2500 at 13 volts" hmm...so it does 100x its power with an extra volt? ...lol
" ferrand cap ore two " Dang! My opinion about lumina kid's spelling has changed drastically.
12-02-2004, 02:23 PM
#3
I would buy the amp (if the price wasnt that crazy)
maybe the person's first language is not english thus his spelling sucks. (u should see my cousin write english)
the amp is rated at 25watts and does 2500 not b/c it jumps its output by 1000x's but b/c its rather simply under rated and what is called a 'cheater amp' which are used in those spl ogranizations where your class is derived from how much power your amp is rated at. (having 2500 watts in a 1-300 watt class gives u some advantage doesnt it?)
this amps looks like the 2000x, but a modified version strickly for spl. it resembles their 4000x model in that it has no filters or crossovers, just input and gain. i would assume that this amp can infact be burped at low loads and it probably doesnt have any protection in it.
a couple years ago this would be a killer competition amp, it still might be today just not at that price.
maybe the person's first language is not english thus his spelling sucks. (u should see my cousin write english)
the amp is rated at 25watts and does 2500 not b/c it jumps its output by 1000x's but b/c its rather simply under rated and what is called a 'cheater amp' which are used in those spl ogranizations where your class is derived from how much power your amp is rated at. (having 2500 watts in a 1-300 watt class gives u some advantage doesnt it?)
this amps looks like the 2000x, but a modified version strickly for spl. it resembles their 4000x model in that it has no filters or crossovers, just input and gain. i would assume that this amp can infact be burped at low loads and it probably doesnt have any protection in it.
a couple years ago this would be a killer competition amp, it still might be today just not at that price.
12-02-2004, 04:04 PM
#5
Originally posted by Father Yuli:
I would buy the amp (if the price wasnt that crazy)
maybe the person's first language is not english thus his spelling sucks. (u should see my cousin write english)
the amp is rated at 25watts and does 2500 not b/c it jumps its output by 1000x's but b/c its rather simply under rated and what is called a 'cheater amp' which are used in those spl ogranizations where your class is derived from how much power your amp is rated at. (having 2500 watts in a 1-300 watt class gives u some advantage doesnt it?)
this amps looks like the 2000x, but a modified version strickly for spl. it resembles their 4000x model in that it has no filters or crossovers, just input and gain. i would assume that this amp can infact be burped at low loads and it probably doesnt have any protection in it.
a couple years ago this would be a killer competition amp, it still might be today just not at that price.
I would buy the amp (if the price wasnt that crazy)
maybe the person's first language is not english thus his spelling sucks. (u should see my cousin write english)
the amp is rated at 25watts and does 2500 not b/c it jumps its output by 1000x's but b/c its rather simply under rated and what is called a 'cheater amp' which are used in those spl ogranizations where your class is derived from how much power your amp is rated at. (having 2500 watts in a 1-300 watt class gives u some advantage doesnt it?)
this amps looks like the 2000x, but a modified version strickly for spl. it resembles their 4000x model in that it has no filters or crossovers, just input and gain. i would assume that this amp can infact be burped at low loads and it probably doesnt have any protection in it.
a couple years ago this would be a killer competition amp, it still might be today just not at that price.
If your cousin wanted to sell something on ebay wouldn't he have you write it up for him to make sure the English is corret?
I mean, there are a tonne of ways to minimize spelling errors.
12-03-2004, 10:18 AM
#7
500 Watt CAFz'r
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 648
The guy's from Kansas he's a "REDNECK" what did you expect [img]graemlins/gunsarecool.gif[/img] [img]graemlins/gunsarecool.gif[/img] [img]graemlins/gunsarecool.gif[/img] [img]graemlins/gunsarecool.gif[/img] [img]graemlins/gunsarecool.gif[/img]
12-03-2004, 11:20 AM
#8
Looks like a 2000x, certainly not a 4000x, too skinny.
His price and spelling is up his azz, plus the model number was removed and painted over....why??...who knows. [img]graemlins/dunno.gif[/img]
So no is the answer to your question from me.
His price and spelling is up his azz, plus the model number was removed and painted over....why??...who knows. [img]graemlins/dunno.gif[/img]
So no is the answer to your question from me.
12-04-2004, 06:18 AM
#10
I will agree with Yuli, I would buy from this guy regardless of his spelling or grammatical errors.
On the other hand, that amp is definitely not a 2000X, but most likely a 100HC from the mid-late 90's. The 2000X doesn't have up/down toroid placement like this one. It doesn't have crossover controls, so it wouldn't be a VLX. So that only leaves the possibility a 100HC. According to the ebay listing, the amp is ¼ ohm stable. Only the VLX 25 shows itself advertised as being ¼ ohm stable, but the VLX series had "Vari Loud" controls, which this amp doesn't.
Considering I owned a 100HC at one time, it did not have any model nomenclature on it either. I also confirmed this by calling US Amps when I was trying to find out what it was. It did, however look identical to the amp listed here. I wouldn't personlly know the possibility of the 100HC to be stable below 1 ohm mono as I hadn't tried running it that low when I had mine.
So now all of you can hush up. [img]smile.gif[/img]
[ December 04, 2004, 07:26 AM: Message edited by: Some conniving bastard ]
On the other hand, that amp is definitely not a 2000X, but most likely a 100HC from the mid-late 90's. The 2000X doesn't have up/down toroid placement like this one. It doesn't have crossover controls, so it wouldn't be a VLX. So that only leaves the possibility a 100HC. According to the ebay listing, the amp is ¼ ohm stable. Only the VLX 25 shows itself advertised as being ¼ ohm stable, but the VLX series had "Vari Loud" controls, which this amp doesn't.
Considering I owned a 100HC at one time, it did not have any model nomenclature on it either. I also confirmed this by calling US Amps when I was trying to find out what it was. It did, however look identical to the amp listed here. I wouldn't personlly know the possibility of the 100HC to be stable below 1 ohm mono as I hadn't tried running it that low when I had mine.
So now all of you can hush up. [img]smile.gif[/img]
[ December 04, 2004, 07:26 AM: Message edited by: Some conniving bastard ]
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Hardcore Rock Superstar
Off-topic Chat
19
12-22-2004 05:34 PM
I'm a Memphis Man now
General SQ
12
03-01-2004 10:32 PM
soLoRed
Off-topic Chat
63
02-26-2004 10:14 AM
