General Discussion General discussion about all things car audio, from pioneer, orion, alpine and eclipse.

2 10"s vs 1 12" - Sound Difference?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 20, 2010 | 09:38 PM
  #1  
Mahna Mahna's Avatar
Thread Starter
50 Watt CAFz'r
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 495
2 10"s vs 1 12" - Sound Difference?

A friend of mine just picked up a JBL GTO7001 amp (700w @ 2ohm) from Best Buy.

We were looking at subs to put in the back of his 87 Camaro and debating the sound difference between two 10's (IDQ's) or a singe 12" (SSA XCON) in the proper sealed box (rear hatch area is pretty small).

My belief is that while the 12" XCON has less cone space, you won't be able to hear the difference between two 10's and one 12". Also, the extra xmax generated by the XCON would compensate for the loss of cone space and the sound would be pretty much the same.

What do you guys think?

Is there an audible difference between the IDQ and XCON?

Would there be a different "feel" between the two?

Thoughts.....
Old Sep 20, 2010 | 10:24 PM
  #2  
veeman's Avatar
2000 Watt CAFz'r
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 2,455
you won't notice a big difference..I had 2 12's in a sealed box (separate chambers) and removed 1 with very little difference in output or SQ. Part of the reason was that the single sub ended up with almost double the power. The only time I did notice a difference was at or near max output, where the single sub sounded stressed compared to the 2 of them, output was almost the same but not as clean and tight, but up to about 80% there was very little difference.
Old Sep 20, 2010 | 10:47 PM
  #3  
avidedtr's Avatar
2000 Watt CAFz'r
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 2,544
Dual idqs will do the job. IMHO the xcon will probably have the Two on output.
Old Sep 21, 2010 | 12:37 AM
  #4  
Lord Huggington's Avatar
1000 Watt CAFz'r
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,462
SSA XCON 12
.9 cf^3 (minimum sealed) FC @ 49.91hz
1.5 cf^3 (maximum sealed) FC @ 43.76hz

"The IDMAX12 has 90.5% more linear displacement than an IDQ12 V.2 with no increase in moving mass."

Image Dynamics IDQ 12
1.3725 cf^3 (sealed) FC @ 46.75hz (Q .707)
Old Sep 28, 2010 | 01:32 PM
  #5  
Mahna Mahna's Avatar
Thread Starter
50 Watt CAFz'r
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 495
Any other comments?
Old Sep 28, 2010 | 01:36 PM
  #6  
avidedtr's Avatar
2000 Watt CAFz'r
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 2,544
Bill if you want subs to SLAM occasionally you will be better off with the SSA/Sundown Sa-12/Fi Q
Old Sep 28, 2010 | 09:49 PM
  #7  
Lord Huggington's Avatar
1000 Watt CAFz'r
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,462
... ported. With a sealed box, the difference of output between a sub with an FC at 40hz vs. a sub with its FC at 30hz (both with similiar Q's) could be approximately a 10dB loss or gain, I mean if they have the same output potential. If you're going sealed, look for a sub(s) with an FC around 30hz, high sensitivity, and a Q of around .707, if you want something like -12dB @ about 20hz and flat from about 30-100hz. That's why I prefer sealed boxes.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
n.russell
General Discussion
10
Aug 9, 2011 09:17 PM
gtabmx
General Discussion
40
Aug 16, 2010 06:58 PM
chillin 12345
General Discussion
3
Jul 15, 2009 06:15 PM
the_garr
General Discussion
4
Nov 30, 2008 05:55 PM
Audio Freak
General Discussion
57
Jan 22, 2004 07:27 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:39 PM.