General SQ General discussion of Sound Quality related issues.

Tweeter Protection in Active Setups

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 16, 2004 | 10:52 AM
  #1  
WK446's Avatar
Thread Starter
0 Watt CAFz'r
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 37
Post

Hi all,

A question for any of you running active setups - do you have any thing protecting your tweeters from DC or other related damage?

Thanks,
Dennis
Old May 16, 2004 | 11:03 AM
  #2  
PEI330Ci's Avatar
1000 Watt CAFz'r
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,783
Post

I don't put anything between the tweeter and the amp. I haven't actually tested this yet, but it can degrade SQ.

I'll be sure to check it out though.

Adam
Old May 16, 2004 | 11:19 AM
  #3  
WK446's Avatar
Thread Starter
0 Watt CAFz'r
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 37
Post

Thanks Adam!
Old May 16, 2004 | 12:10 PM
  #4  
Nissan Guy's Avatar
50 Watt CAFz'r
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 456
Post

I have used, polycell in lower end setups, and in my current active setup. I could not hear the difference, although audiophiles would argue that you can.
PEI, have you ever used a lightbulb to soak up dc?
I would assume that you can't hear a lightbulb in series...what do you think?
Old May 16, 2004 | 12:29 PM
  #5  
PEI330Ci's Avatar
1000 Watt CAFz'r
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,783
Post

Light bulbs by their very nature are resistors with tighly packed coils running through them. A light bulb will not offer just DC protection, but over current protection in general. (AC and DC current equally) I have heard this meathod employed in other speakers, and it degrades the SQ. That said, I've never actually measured a light bulb before to see what it does.

Once again, someone has givin me one more thing to test. I can measure resistance, impedence, capicitance, and inductance with my testing gear. LOL....I never thought I'd be testing a light bulb.

Adam
Old May 17, 2004 | 05:50 AM
  #6  
Sassmaster's Avatar
Merry Christmass from CCA
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 2,579
Post

The only problem with testing a light bulb, is that is has a very low resistance when it's not on. as you put power through it, the filament heats up (it's coil shaped, but not really a coil)and that heat creates resistance, which creates heat which causes the filament to glow... testing a light bulb is pretty useless, the only real concerns are
A tiny filament, so not much conductor to carry the signal.
B as you put power through thr filament, it will cause more resistance the more power you put through it.. so your tweeters will not increase in volume as they should in relation to the woofer.
C in theory, if the filament's coiling was tight enough, you could get some weird sonic effects that would seriously degrade sound quality.

just my $0.02
Old May 17, 2004 | 08:29 AM
  #7  
AAAAAAA's Avatar
2000 Watt CAFz'r
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,010
Post

I just moved over to all active and have no protection. One of my main concerns is if someone (and that someone could be me) were to push that button on my active xover that transforms 1hz to x 1000hz and instead of the tweet getting >3500hz, it would be at >350hz. yikes!

My resolution comp set came with "light bulbs" in as part as the passives. I beleive just making a passive set tuned to just under what your active set is at should offer adequate protection...or maybe not?

I dont see ilght bulbs in most higher end passives, so I never though of AC being such an issue unless they use other types of AC filtering parts.
Old May 21, 2004 | 11:54 AM
  #10  
Number 2's Avatar
1000 Watt CAFz'r
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 1,890
Post

I never noticed a difference when having the protection there or not. They wouldn't design a crossover so it has a flaw, It should be as good as the speakers in its matched set.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:06 PM.