OkanaganDCaudio
#82
When i got back from the show & researched box rise eventually I started to think that was the issue, If i am correct it has to do with the resistance inside the enclosure creating a higher ohm load to each woofer ?
This enclosure has a much larger port & should act in a much more unconstricted manner If i understand box rise correctly. I deffinatly had to re-tune all my gains to get it just as loud with this box, So almost right away in the back of my head i knew I had messed up. Meh, Still had a great time Hell, Even when we put it all together & I saw how small it was inside even before putting the subs in, I was like oh F' what did i do, lol. Then i went back & realised i had copyed the cut sheet wrong & also cut off a huge portion of the box with my epic port experiment fail.
#83
#84
The VERY first one i built for the subs, Was the one we replaced before the show.
It had no carpet / paint & only 129 square inches of port was tuned to somthing like 30hz or so.
( port along the bottom facing hatch )
It was about 12 cubes after displacement, But it did not go over the wheel wells & was rediculously high. It thundered out pretty hard & didnt give me as bad of voltage issues.
We felt that it was to close to the roof to be effective & also the port was too small, Witch is why we decided to try & rush a new one before the last soundsgood show.
It sounded alot better though in the end lol The new one just hit highs pretty good, But really didnt preform nearly aswell. I was pretty pissed at myself but the fun of the event quickly took that way lol
It had no carpet / paint & only 129 square inches of port was tuned to somthing like 30hz or so.
( port along the bottom facing hatch )
It was about 12 cubes after displacement, But it did not go over the wheel wells & was rediculously high. It thundered out pretty hard & didnt give me as bad of voltage issues.
We felt that it was to close to the roof to be effective & also the port was too small, Witch is why we decided to try & rush a new one before the last soundsgood show.
It sounded alot better though in the end lol The new one just hit highs pretty good, But really didnt preform nearly aswell. I was pretty pissed at myself but the fun of the event quickly took that way lol
#85
ya the box was way to high of an enclosure needed to be shunk , and the port needed to be twice the size of what it was but all in all was a learning experiance
#86
#87
The hatches of SUV's have little vent areas beside the glass where it closes down so the hatch can close when all the windows are up.
I have heard from sealing thease you can gain 2db alone because they vent out so much SPL.
#89
ya my port for 2 12's is 6 inches wide, 14 inches tall and 19 inches deep. I am tuned for what i am hoping to be around 42-46hz if I am not at that number when i test I will build a new box and aim for about 36 hz and add resin which should leave me around 39 to 40 hz with sub displacement etc.
#90
ya my port for 2 12's is 6 inches wide, 14 inches tall and 19 inches deep. I am tuned for what i am hoping to be around 42-46hz if I am not at that number when i test I will build a new box and aim for about 36 hz and add resin which should leave me around 39 to 40 hz with sub displacement etc.
There was a sunfire down there with 2x AQ 1200s on 2 FI BL 12''s same style setup as you, Not as big of a port though. It sounded great & did some good #'s I cant wait to see how incriminator stacks up. I think it will do very well, Do you use a box calculator ? I find torres box calculator is great for giving you an idea of what your tuning will be.