Enclosure Design & Construction Help Post and discuss your car audio box construction, design, fiberglass and other fabrication questions here.

Slot port vs Round port confusion!!!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-13-2008, 08:12 PM
  #1  
0 Watt CAFz'r
Thread Starter
 
phat_71's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 27
Question Slot port vs Round port confusion!!!

Alright, so basically a port is a port is a port, as long as it's built right and tuned properly it'll do the same job either way. What I want want to know is, are there any benefits for one or the other? I think given my new box design (1.3 cubic feet) and 10 inch subs, a slot port would probably be the most "space efficient" way to go, but I'm a total noob with that design, so I'm not really sure that's what I want to do. Any help would be great
phat_71 is offline  
Old 11-13-2008, 09:28 PM
  #2  
50 Watt CAFz'r
iTrader: (3)
 
andrewsfm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 320
You've got round ports, square ports and vents.

According to a port length calculator website I recently used, vents can be shorter than the other ports, because it uses a side of the enclosure as a wall of the port, and the resonanace makes it act like a longer port.

Round ports can be easily made of PVC pipe, and flared on the ends with things like RF Aeroport ends to reduce port noise, while square ports might be a little harder to build and flare.

It's also easier to build a slot port into the box design, and allow a big enough opening to avoid port noise.

So yes, as you said, slot ports are the most efficient in my opinion.

This might help...
PORT Size Calculations and Formulas for WOOFER and Subwoofer BOXES
andrewsfm is offline  
Old 11-14-2008, 07:43 AM
  #3  
50 Watt CAFz'r
 
turboeeyore's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 259
1.3 cubic feet for 1 10? if you're using a slot port you can take advantage of rounding the inside corners with sonotube and resin and forcing the air toward the port.problem is the more you add in the box the more air space you take away. the problem is with a slot port on a small box having it run the whole hight of the box will make it a very small opening when tuning for a good frequency. the bigger the opening the shorter the runner inside becomes. take your measurements and check it out the port calculator, you'll see if you want a port 2'' wide the inside will only be 2 inches long.(exaggerated) the port will only end up being a inch wide. a 3'' round port will probabally be best for one sub in a small box. this is a daily driver right?
turboeeyore is offline  
Old 11-14-2008, 09:32 AM
  #4  
--SPECIAL ED--
iTrader: (3)
 
PsychoAcoustics Canada's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 2,364
actually the narrower the slot the longer the port wall becomes.
PsychoAcoustics Canada is offline  
Old 11-14-2008, 12:42 PM
  #5  
Level 3 Supporter
iTrader: (17)
 
Father Yuli's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Posts: 11,606
Originally Posted by Citrate
actually the narrower the slot the longer the port wall becomes.
What the black guy said ^^^^
Father Yuli is offline  
Old 11-14-2008, 12:50 PM
  #6  
0 Watt CAFz'r
Thread Starter
 
phat_71's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 27
Oh yea, it's definitely a daily driver, lol. I'm not quite on competition level, but at the same time I like to have things done right. I get annoyed with all the idiots who buy random parts and put them in prefab crap and are like OMG my stereo rocks! I'll admit mine isn't the absolute best, but it's none too shabby. Pioneer Premier DEH-P500UB deck and PRS-D1200m amp, with a pair of TS-W257D4 10 inch subs, all run with 2 gauge wire. I've also got a 4 Farad Soundstream cap that I have yet to install, but that's only due to lack of wire. Apparently 17 foot wiring kits don't do so well in a 92 Cadillac that happens to be 17 feet long :P

Anyway, since a round port seems to be the simplest solution for me right now, what about orientation? What would be the best direction to point them. As it stands, I'm planning on putting the subs facing rear like they are now, but even that is easy to change if it'll make a difference in what kind of sound I get inside.
phat_71 is offline  
Old 11-14-2008, 08:37 PM
  #7  
50 Watt CAFz'r
iTrader: (3)
 
andrewsfm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 320
See if you have room to place the port on the front panel facing the same direction as the sub. That's the ideal location. I believe it's supposed to be as far away from the actual driver itself as possible.
andrewsfm is offline  
Old 11-14-2008, 09:31 PM
  #8  
2000 Watt CAFz'r
iTrader: (6)
 
jalat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 2,736
Its a rough sketch but you get the idea.
~3 cubic feet @ 35hz

Its super simple to build and cheap too.

Name:  3cubes35hz.jpg
Views: 13915
Size:  71.1 KB
jalat is offline  
Old 11-15-2008, 09:42 AM
  #9  
50 Watt CAFz'r
 
turboeeyore's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 259
Originally Posted by turboeeyore
the bigger the opening the shorter the runner inside becomes.
like i said the BIGGER the opening the shorter the port length. a "short port" gives too much port noise, the deeper into the box the crisper the response, but no closer to the back of the box than the width of the port ( 2inch port, no closer than 2'' from the back of the box) but keep in mind the frequency changes with length. so use the port caculator for help.

Last edited by turboeeyore; 11-15-2008 at 09:47 AM.
turboeeyore is offline  
Old 11-15-2008, 10:15 AM
  #10  
Administrator
 
Dukk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 16,855
The more port area, the longer it has to be for the same tuning. Among other things, it largely becomes the tradeoff - area for length.

A slot vent is fine - try to keep the length of the opening no more than 6x the width though - ie. something like a 14" x 1" opening is a poor design.
Dukk is offline  


Quick Reply: Slot port vs Round port confusion!!!



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:50 PM.