General Discussion General discussion about all things car audio, from pioneer, orion, alpine and eclipse.

amp theory question

Old 12-16-2009, 10:21 AM
  #1  
0 Watt CAFz'r
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
medway creek's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 18
amp theory question

Noobie theoretical question here:

Say I have a 2-way passive component set and an amp with 150wrms per side, all numbers @ 4ohms. Does each of the 4 drivers see 150w or 75w or some variation I'm not taking into account?

Your patience is appreciated.
medway creek is offline  
Old 12-16-2009, 11:12 AM
  #2  
1000 Watt CAFz'r
iTrader: (1)
 
Tom.F.1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,217
Originally Posted by medway creek
Noobie theoretical question here:

Say I have a 2-way passive component set and an amp with 150wrms per side, all numbers @ 4ohms. Does each of the 4 drivers see 150w or 75w or some variation I'm not taking into account?

Your patience is appreciated.
A crossover splits frequency, not power.

If you put 150 w @ 100 hz into your component set, most of it will go to the woofer. There are normal, expected, losses in the passive crossover.
If you put 150 w @ 10,000 Hz into to your component set, most of it will go to the Tweeter. And you'll kill the tweeter.
Music contains much higher power levels at low frequency than at high frequency. i.e. it takes a lot more power to make that 100 Hz seem as loud to your ears as the 10,000 Hz.

This is why we need bigger amps for subs.
Tom.F.1 is offline  
Old 12-16-2009, 11:46 AM
  #3  
0 Watt CAFz'r
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
medway creek's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 18
I think that answers my question - without looking at losses in the system or fq response or anything like that, just the electrical side of it, all the drivers have the potential to see the full 150rms? it's not halved or doubled or anything like that?
What I'm trying to figure out basically is if there would be a major difference in power delivery potential (active/passive issues ignored) between say a 150rmsx2 vs (50rmsx2 + 100rmsx2).
medway creek is offline  
Old 12-16-2009, 12:45 PM
  #4  
500 Watt CAFz'r
iTrader: (3)
 
zoomer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 598
Originally Posted by medway creek
I think that answers my question - without looking at losses in the system or fq response or anything like that, just the electrical side of it, all the drivers have the potential to see the full 150rms? it's not halved or doubled or anything like that?
What I'm trying to figure out basically is if there would be a major difference in power delivery potential (active/passive issues ignored) between say a 150rmsx2 vs (50rmsx2 + 100rmsx2).
yes you would remember watts = V^2/R Vsquared divided by R
Let me explain:

lets say you have 10volts rms at 100Hz and 5 volt rms at 5KHz
that would be 25 watts at 100hz and 6.25watts at 5Khz for a total of 31.25 watts needed to be delivered to the speakers. However, if the 2 voltages add up, your amp will have to put out a voltage of 15 V rms and would be like asking the amp to deliver voltage equivalent of a 56.25 watt amp. So you will need a 56.5 watt amp to deliver a clean 31.5 watts to the speakers.


If you stay passive but biamp your speakers, in other words an amp for each driver with the crossovers split into a low freq and high freq section (not all crossovers let you do that, only the high end ones) each amp will still be asked to amplify the total signal of 15 volts and the result would be very similar to using a single amp. The only difference is that the HF amp will not have to deliver the LF current and thus will distort a bit less and will run cooler. Why? becuse the HF amp sees open circuit at low frequencies and thus delivers no power at low freqs and vice verse.

However if you go active, then each amp only sees its own frequencies..
The LF amp will only need to be a 25 watt amp to deliver 25 watts and the HF amp only needs to be 6.25watts in order to deliver 6.25 watts.

There is a very good explanation at
http://sound.westhost.com/bi-amp.htm#elect_xovers

in that article he uses the term bi-amplification for both active and passive systems, but does a good job at explaining the advantage of active vs passive in a bi amped system
zoomer is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Prolifik
General SPL
26
04-08-2006 02:12 AM
Paul Niwranski
General Discussion
18
12-30-2005 03:55 AM
Tlake
Off-topic Chat
8
01-16-2005 05:19 PM
hawg_hauler
Install related
8
06-01-2004 04:05 PM
Curtis S
General SPL
3
09-11-2003 10:21 PM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: amp theory question



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:24 AM.