Car Audio Forumz - The #1 Car Audio Forum

Car Audio Forumz - The #1 Car Audio Forum (https://www.caraudioforumz.com/)
-   General Discussion (https://www.caraudioforumz.com/general-discussion-10/)
-   -   Bose electromagnetic suspension (https://www.caraudioforumz.com/general-discussion-10/bose-electromagnetic-suspension-2190/)

Orion_95 08-30-2004 10:48 PM

http://www.bose.com/controller;jsessionid=B0Q2dDDusNpd6tBZY1wqz0eK6xbJ 1dLGEq0ZS99S7agPGQqym8Iv!-373760557!1879924776?event=VIEW_STATIC_PAGE_EVENT& url=/learning/project_sound/bose_s uspension.jsp&pageName=/automotive/index.jsp

SUX 2BU 08-31-2004 08:33 AM

Interesting, but I don't see a whole lot different in it's goal of operation than what some higher-end luxury and performance cars have now with their active suspensions. Most are pneumatically or gas-controlled though, not electric. And if it's a Bose system, I wouldn't trust it past the warranty period :D

One thing of Bose I do like and would like to experience though is their 5.1 headphone system. Apparently it's just like true 5.1 surround sound in a 2-speaker headphone. Sounds trippy. Talk about majorly heavy processing!

hobbes26 08-31-2004 09:45 AM

Some active suspensions I've read about use ferrofluids...

I wonder why Bose is spending money on this type of research, and not into audio... This seems a bit far from their 'forte' (if that's what you can call it)

mike bisson 08-31-2004 10:58 AM

Ahhh... BOSE: no highs, no lows -- just blows!

Dave MacKinnon 08-31-2004 09:04 PM

Um, yeah.. Monroe was developing the magneto-electric suspension more than 10 years ago, and long before it was used on a production car.

This Bose system is a good concept, but electromechanic devices have a nasty tendancy to fail, so I'll stick with my mechanical shocks thanks.

Don't beleive me? Ask BMW why their 7-series cars were voted the most unreliable cars on the road for 2004 by Consumer Reports magazine. Can you say electronics?

SUX 2BU 08-31-2004 10:35 PM

^ Agreed. BMW has one of the worse reliability reputations right now. Mercedes isn't all that far behind. So what ARE you paying for when you buy a $100k+ car anyway? [img]tongue.gif[/img] Fancy gadgets and gizmos are great....until they break. There are quite a few cars on the road that 10 years ago were technological whizzes when new but now they are big dollars to fix. No thanks. That's why I was glad my 90 Daytona had 0 options, a 5 speed and the Mistu-built V6 [img]smile.gif[/img] Simplicity is sublime.

loudsubz 09-01-2004 05:03 AM

i hear ya

who needs an electronic trunk closer on the Mercedes anyways
only for lazy folk

OldOneEye 09-01-2004 01:09 PM

I was pretty sure it was the I-Drive or whatever they call it that caused that.

Same with Mercedes Benz for that matter. Too mnay people had to go back to the dealership when they couldn't figure out how to turn on the AC without doing a street fighter 38 hit button combo to do it ("X, Y, R1, R2, start, pause, left, right, left, right, up, down.... cool, the AC came on")

Juan


Originally posted by Dave_MacKinnon:
Um, yeah.. Monroe was developing the magneto-electric suspension more than 10 years ago, and long before it was used on a production car.

This Bose system is a good concept, but electromechanic devices have a nasty tendancy to fail, so I'll stick with my mechanical shocks thanks.

Don't beleive me? Ask BMW why their 7-series cars were voted the most unreliable cars on the road for 2004 by Consumer Reports magazine. Can you say electronics?


Brandon 09-01-2004 07:21 PM

I guess I'll mention it....I like Rod Millen's shock design that uses a magnetic fluid(I'm not sure what it is) and hardens or liquifies useing a magnnetic charge to dampen automatically according to road conditions. Wicked idea....too bad the system itself is so big it barely fits in a Hummer H1.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:05 AM.


© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands