General Discussion General discussion about all things car audio, from pioneer, orion, alpine and eclipse.

Class D Amp vs just an Amp

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 12, 2005 | 10:42 AM
  #1  
cidley69's Avatar
Thread Starter
50 Watt CAFz'r
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 68
Post

Can anyone explain (in layman english) the difference between a class D amp and an non-class D amp?


any insight would be appreciated.
Old Feb 12, 2005 | 10:58 AM
  #3  
Haunz's Avatar
4000 Watt CAFz'r
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 4,218
Post

The output transistors operate in switch mode... they are either on or off...
Old Feb 12, 2005 | 11:16 AM
  #4  
Jmac's Avatar
500 Watt CAFz'r
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 575
Post

In general, Class D is superior for subwoofers because of the increased efficiency (less strain on your electrical system) ... However, most class D amplifiers are unable to operate the full range of frequencies and, thus, are limited to only bass/midbass ...
Old Feb 12, 2005 | 11:49 AM
  #5  
cidley69's Avatar
Thread Starter
50 Watt CAFz'r
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 68
Post

Thanks y'all. That does explain lots for me.

Have you guys heard this before: that whatever the RMS wattage of a speaker(s) that the amp running it should be double that?

in other words a 500 watt rms sub should have a 1000 watt amp?


or would that be overkill?


thanks again.
Old Feb 12, 2005 | 11:53 AM
  #6  
Vanilla Gorilla's Avatar
1000 Watt CAFz'r
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 1,145
Post

thats what I do, avoids amp clipping. If fried tons of subs because of amp clipping.
Old Feb 12, 2005 | 12:06 PM
  #7  
timmyturtle's Avatar
50 Watt CAFz'r
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 337
Post

That's not a 'set rule', but generally you want a bit more 'overhead' in terms of power. Eg.: it's not uncommon to see someones front stage amp with double, triple (or more) the recommended rms wattage being fed to the speakers) with the gain turned low. It's all about balance. I've set up a 300 rms sub (PG) with a 75x2 amp (MTX) (150 rms mono I believe) and it sounded fine. Now, it was in my ex's daily driver car; I wouldn't run that for extended periods of time (amp strain). It's better to have more than less (you can always turn your gain(s) down [this is good for several reasons].
Old Feb 12, 2005 | 12:35 PM
  #8  
Haunz's Avatar
4000 Watt CAFz'r
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 4,218
Post

Originally posted by SPL donut ...:
thats what I do, avoids amp clipping. If fried tons of subs because of amp clipping.
Dude... you need to take a breath and realize that clipping is rarely the root cause of woofer death...

If your sub has a long term thermal rating then I wouldnt hesistate to give it 2 or even 4x the power... however most speakers/subs are rated for long term program..... IE. 2-8 hours with music...

This shouldnt be exceeded by much in most cases unless you know what the rating is based on... 2x the power with a sub that has a musical rating may produce a blown woofer after 45min of use.....
Old Feb 12, 2005 | 01:15 PM
  #9  
slow/n\low's Avatar
500 Watt CAFz'r
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 866
Post

Haunz Haunz your making yourself look silly again. [img]graemlins/bow.gif[/img]
Old Feb 12, 2005 | 01:17 PM
  #10  
Tim Baillie.'s Avatar
2000 Watt CAFz'r
 
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 2,406
Post

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA................................ ..

Oh my............................

hahahah.................

Clipping is my friend

[ February 12, 2005, 02:19 PM: Message edited by: Tim Baillie. ]



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:50 AM.