Does anyone still use isobaric or isovent?
#5
Guest
Posts: n/a
Originally posted by imntense:
dwvw when you say nowadays mass simulates this what do you mean?
dwvw when you say nowadays mass simulates this what do you mean?
#6
I gotcha now i just didn't understand what you were telling me but now i see what you were saying. I'm sorry if i seem off, i feel like i'm in a war zone. That is with all the stupid posts and post removals around us right now!
#8
Hehe, I'm no hero, I'm just doing what comes natural to me
I should probably delete those posts though, there making me and this thread look stupid because I think those dudes are gone.
I called them DUDES, you know what a dude is? It's a pimple on a horse's ***.
That only applies to people that REALLY are dudes though.
I should probably delete those posts though, there making me and this thread look stupid because I think those dudes are gone.
I called them DUDES, you know what a dude is? It's a pimple on a horse's ***.
That only applies to people that REALLY are dudes though.
#9
Guest
Posts: n/a
the main advantage of isobaric is the addition of an extra motor assembly, spider, surround, magnet etc. you get 2 motors working to control excursion, the sound will be tighter and usually deeper bass due to better cone control at lower frequencies, the debates have gone on forever which is better compound or push pull, i prefer compound because of potential pole vent noise, but both sound great, better than average imho