General Discussion General discussion about all things car audio, from pioneer, orion, alpine and eclipse.

Are EQ's more trouble than they' re really worth?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-26-2004, 02:14 PM
  #12  
50 Watt CAFz'r
 
deathtofs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 61
Post

speaker placement is key, proper speaker placement = no need for an eq, just a thought.
deathtofs is offline  
Old 08-26-2004, 02:56 PM
  #13  
50 Watt CAFz'r
iTrader: (8)
 
timmyturtle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 337
Post

Quick point: all CD's weren't recorded (studio) the same. It's nice to have an in dash eq to adjust the different music styles/CD's 'on the fly'. Some head unit's eq adjustment settings can be a bit cumbersome to access while driving to adjust to a variety of music styles/types. We're talking daily driver I suppose, but I really enjoy the ease of adjustment (7 bands, triple 6V outputs and easy sub control).
timmyturtle is offline  
Old 08-26-2004, 04:22 PM
  #14  
500 Watt CAFz'r
 
mqqball's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 550
Post

Originally posted by timmyturtle:
Quick point: all CD's weren't recorded (studio) the same. It's nice to have an in dash eq to adjust the different music styles/CD's 'on the fly'. Some head unit's eq adjustment settings can be a bit cumbersome to access while driving to adjust to a variety of music styles/types. We're talking daily driver I suppose, but I really enjoy the ease of adjustment (7 bands, triple 6V outputs and easy sub control).
You maybe making it "sound better" but you have to ask yourself what are you essentially doing to the program material. On what basis are you making your adjustments. Do you have a reference system that you continually refer to and base all your adjustments on? What you are talking about is essentially a glorified tone control. A real EQ is not for the music but rather for the environment.
mqqball is offline  
Old 08-27-2004, 01:22 PM
  #16  
1000 Watt CAFz'r
iTrader: (1)
 
mike bisson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,156
Post

^^^^ I have to second that... most of the best cars I have listened too have not had EQing in them.

Many (not all) people with EQ's pursue "the perfect curve" and try to flatten the sound to such a point that it loses its musicality and verve.

I am probably in the minority in my opinion; however, I find many IASCA type systems too clinical... I always feel like I am listening to the system as opposed to listening too the music.

Perhaps I have spent too many years on the stage and in studios to know any better, but to me... if I cannot establish an emotional connection to what I am listening too -- I find it hard to enjoy the experiance.
mike bisson is offline  
Old 08-27-2004, 05:35 PM
  #17  
1000 Watt CAFz'r
 
PEI330Ci's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,783
Post

I didn't buy the PXA H900 because it had tons of EQ options. There were other areas I was searching for the "Ultimate".

Adam
PEI330Ci is offline  
Old 08-27-2004, 09:25 PM
  #19  
1000 Watt CAFz'r
iTrader: (1)
 
mike bisson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,156
Post

Dave, in honor of you this is my 500th post...

I think we should change the title of this thread to

"Is Defro more trouble than he is worth"? [img]tongue.gif[/img]
mike bisson is offline  


Quick Reply: Are EQ's more trouble than they' re really worth?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:14 PM.