General Discussion General discussion about all things car audio, from pioneer, orion, alpine and eclipse.

How important is POWER?

Old Jul 23, 2004 | 01:59 AM
  #1  
frontmanblue's Avatar
Thread Starter
50 Watt CAFz'r
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 68
Post

lets assume high end amps such as AUDISON

is 60W enough for midbass driver or 100W better?

is 4 *60W enough to run thru a 3 way bi-amp x-over? therefore 60w for tweeter & midrange and another 60w for midbass. or is 100W better

Is 180W enough for a 10" SUB or is 300-400 Watts better.

Looking for really good SQ. NOT SPL
Old Jul 23, 2004 | 04:15 AM
  #2  
Hardwrkr's Avatar
2000 Watt CAFz'r
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 3,542
Post

To keep things as dynamic as possible put all the power you can to the speakers.
Old Jul 23, 2004 | 06:17 AM
  #3  
TomK's Avatar
1000 Watt CAFz'r
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 1,649
Post

Boog-***............. you can get exceptional SQ from limited power. The amps should match with the drivers you have purchased. This whole MORE power thing is so BS............. mind you, if you want it, I'll hazard a guess that all of us in the retail/distribution side of things have no issues selling it too you. But do you really need it is what you have to ask yourself.......... or should I say, do your speakers really need it to work optimally?!??!?!? Some do and some definitely don't.
Old Jul 23, 2004 | 07:33 AM
  #4  
Impala Builder's Avatar
50 Watt CAFz'r
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 206
Post

Originally posted by frontmanblue:

Looking for really good SQ. NOT SPL
My opinion is go with lot's of power, but I'm building for a very specific goal (IASCA).

In Rina Beckhams truck she has 1600 watts and 5 speakers. Really she's only putting out maybe a few hundred because the gains are all the way down, and the crossover levels are also turned down.

Why so much power when we don't use it ?

The system has the ability to be dynamic and never run out of power (thus causing poor reproduction)

Two ways to go, lot's of power, or efficent drivers, or both.

I wrote in another post (same topic) my opinion on this one. Do a serch others also posted on this one.

Me.....I like big power and good drivers [img]graemlins/headbang.gif[/img]
Old Jul 23, 2004 | 09:10 AM
  #8  
PEI330Ci's Avatar
1000 Watt CAFz'r
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,783
Post

In reference to Audison VRx amps:

They use an output distortion limiter to curb the amp from being overdriven. At 2% distortion, the input gain is rolled back to limit clipping on the output stage. Simply put, they have a volume control to turn down the volume when you exceed the output capability of the amp.

Some other amps have this feature as well, but they do cost a fair penny. (this being one of a plethora of high end features)

For an actively powered 3 way, I'd recomend 50 watts for tweeters, 50 watts for midranges, and around 100 watts for midbasses. Assuming a moderately efficent speaker system is used, this should give realistic reproduction of most all music.

For an actively powered 2 way, I'd use 50 watts for tweeters, and 50 to 100 watts for midrange.

But....

I'm a bit of a dynamic headroom junky, so I subscribe to Jamie's formula if you can afford it.


Just as a note, some of the best high end home audio amps in the world are under 50 watts per channel.

Adam
Old Jul 23, 2004 | 10:05 AM
  #10  
Jmac's Avatar
500 Watt CAFz'r
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 575
Post

Aren't most high-end amplifiers underrated like a "****," as one might say ?

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:42 AM.