General Discussion General discussion about all things car audio, from pioneer, orion, alpine and eclipse.

How important is POWER?

Old Jul 24, 2004 | 01:52 AM
  #21  
frontmanblue's Avatar
Thread Starter
50 Watt CAFz'r
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 68
Post

Thanks for all the comments.

So, here is another question

VRx lower power but higher end

VS.

LRX higher power but not the highest end in the lineup

Same Money.

Which one would you choose?
Old Jul 24, 2004 | 08:50 AM
  #22  
JohnVroom's Avatar
Yankee
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 3,599
Post

Is it a power question or a SQ question
... can you hear a difference? probably not
... is one noticibly louder? probably not (assuming same ratings)
... can you afford both
... does image/ appearance matter
Old Jul 24, 2004 | 11:08 AM
  #23  
frontmanblue's Avatar
Thread Starter
50 Watt CAFz'r
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 68
Post

SQ question but enough power is required to drive the speakers well

Yes, I can afford both.
Old Jul 24, 2004 | 09:56 PM
  #25  
hobbes26's Avatar
50 Watt CAFz'r
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 146
Post

Originally posted by Chadxton:
I have had no problem feeding 3x recommended power to my speakers.

After the install, and the equipment you use, it's all about the power.
Just cause you got an amp that is able to put out 300W doesn't mean you're feeding that much power to the speaker...
Old Jul 25, 2004 | 02:03 AM
  #26  
Chadxton's Avatar
2000 Watt CAFz'r
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 2,707
Post

^Yes I know. But the dynamic potential is what the power is all about..
Old Jul 25, 2004 | 09:24 AM
  #27  
Icon's Avatar
2000 Watt CAFz'r
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 2,357
Post

depends, were just fitting a car with all macrom for a show in winnipeg, we want to get it in the 1-600 watts basic class.. I think were only giving the subs 120 a piece right now< might change. from what I've heard for the sq portion you don't need alot of power for the subs.

more is great just depends on what you need
Old Jul 25, 2004 | 04:40 PM
  #28  
JohnVroom's Avatar
Yankee
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 3,599
Post

It is a yin/yang thing if you go low power you need efficient drivers to hit 'minimum' SPL levels. I have heard many home systems with satisfying SPL levels with only 13 watts or so (but not playing sub bass heavy music). BUT to get realistic bass slam you need some headroom and some watts (120 W should be enough in a quiet car).
Old Jul 26, 2004 | 04:56 PM
  #29  
mike bisson's Avatar
1000 Watt CAFz'r
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,156
Post

Originally posted by hobbes26:
</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by Chadxton:
I have had no problem feeding 3x recommended power to my speakers.

After the install, and the equipment you use, it's all about the power.
Just cause you got an amp that is able to put out 300W doesn't mean you're feeding that much power to the speaker... </font>[/QUOTE]This brings up another point -- many "higher end" car and home amplifiers are "biased" in such a way that in many class "a/b" amplifers (for example Parasound or Quad) the first 10% of the amplifiers capability is biased towards class a -- So, in many cases, not over driving the amplifer allows it to operate more towards the class "a" scale of its bias.
Old Jul 26, 2004 | 08:48 PM
  #30  
Eli47's Avatar
500 Watt CAFz'r
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 952
Post

I agree Mike, it's not just a question of power quantity, but quality of power.
Power as in Watts, is like Horsepower to an engine, and Amperes are like torque, but all the horsepower without the right amount of torque won't go far.
If it's SQ you are after, and you CAN afford a better amplifier and interconnects, then get as much power as you can afford, and the best SQ amp you can buy, the Audison is a very nice sounding amplifier, so no matter which model you opt for, it's a good choice with many head units and speakers.

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:35 AM.