General Discussion General discussion about all things car audio, from pioneer, orion, alpine and eclipse.

JBL amps??

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 16, 2004 | 04:38 PM
  #11  
Haunz's Avatar
4000 Watt CAFz'r
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 4,218
Post

Because he's never used them... [img]tongue.gif[/img]
Old Sep 16, 2004 | 06:15 PM
  #12  
Speakerman's Avatar
Yankee
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 219
Post

Originally posted by bluetroll:
i hate JBL car audio equipment... it's garbage.
Those are harsh words buddy. Everys got their opinion... but can you back yours up?
[img]graemlins/deal4u.gif[/img]

[ September 16, 2004, 08:56 PM: Message edited by: Speakerman ]
Old Sep 17, 2004 | 07:42 AM
  #13  
CLUBCONCEPTS's Avatar
50 Watt CAFz'r
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 143
Post

Ouch. Well, I love JBL amps. I am runing 3 perfect 10.1's off of my 1200.1 It runs all day full tilt at car shows and it never heats up. But the BP series stuff is disco, they new crown series stuff is even better. I used to build commericial sound systems (nightclubs ect) and all I ever used was either JBL or Crown 'K'series amps, so I guess I am a bit biased.
Old Sep 17, 2004 | 08:48 AM
  #14  
JordyO's Avatar
4000 Watt CAFz'r
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 6,363
Post

Originally posted by bluetroll:
i hate JBL car audio equipment... it's garbage.
You clearly have no idea wtf you're talking about.
Old Sep 17, 2004 | 12:01 PM
  #15  
Audio_Rookie's Avatar
500 Watt CAFz'r
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 784
Post

LOL!, I hooked up my jbl 1200.1 to my buddies 18" MA competition woofer....DAMN!!!!!!
JBL ROCKS!
Old Sep 17, 2004 | 01:44 PM
  #16  
JohnVroom's Avatar
Yankee
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 3,599
Post

JBL is one of the oldest manufacturers on the planet, but they need to make price points so some of their stuff should be "great" and other stuff should be "OK".

In all honesty, given their marquee they should make the highest SPL and the best SQ drivers out there (top 5% from another thread)... period. And Crown given THEIR marquee should make some of the best amps, but I do not think they are top dog in all categories so they need to work a little harder IMO on their mid-range products.

[ September 17, 2004, 02:46 PM: Message edited by: JohnVroom ]
Old Sep 19, 2004 | 11:03 AM
  #17  
KingRukus's Avatar
500 Watt CAFz'r
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 502
Post

I had a 1200.1 for a few years and it was an awesome amp. Got rid of it to try new things. Things that didn't impress me with it though were the lack of subsonic filter (destroyed 2 JL 12W4's without it), innaccurate adjustment *****, and poor x-overs.
Old Sep 19, 2004 | 11:36 AM
  #18  
bluetroll's Avatar
50 Watt CAFz'r
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 130
Post

the sound from a JBL amp is terrible....

my BP600.1 blew up... started smoking.... lasted a lil over a year.

in the wise words of MoPete... "if you want the best, you gotta go JBL".... hahahaha...

[ September 19, 2004, 12:37 PM: Message edited by: bluetroll ]
Old Sep 19, 2004 | 06:19 PM
  #19  
91cb7's Avatar
0 Watt CAFz'r
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 19
Post

Originally posted by KingRukus:
lack of subsonic filter (destroyed 2 JL 12W4's without it)
I always wonder how important a subsonic filter is especially in a ported box. Are you sure it was the lack of an SSF destroying your JLs?
Old Sep 19, 2004 | 07:00 PM
  #20  
Speakerman's Avatar
Yankee
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 219
Post

Originally posted by 91cb7:
</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by KingRukus:
lack of subsonic filter (destroyed 2 JL 12W4's without it)
I always wonder how important a subsonic filter is especially in a ported box. Are you sure it was the lack of an SSF destroying your JLs? </font>[/QUOTE]Oh yes. It is very important. When the subwoofer plays notes too far below the tuning frequency it tends to throw out like mad dog. thus causing ripped spiders/surrounds, and voice coild misalignment.

[ September 19, 2004, 08:01 PM: Message edited by: Speakerman ]



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:40 AM.