General Discussion General discussion about all things car audio, from pioneer, orion, alpine and eclipse.

Most powerful 5.25 coaxials out there?

Old Nov 6, 2008 | 01:59 PM
  #11  
MR2NR's Avatar
4000 Watt CAFz'r
iTrader: (66)
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 6,420
Morel for sure, I am not sure about the mounting depth issue but will look into that for you when I make it into the shop later today. (I am supposed to be putting siding on right now).
Old Nov 6, 2008 | 02:16 PM
  #12  
John__Taylor's Avatar
50 Watt CAFz'r
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 483
Look into DLS.

I have a set of UP6 components in the front and they are rated for 150 WRms iirc.

Many of the low/mid level DLS sets are rated relatively high, but as many here will tell you, power handling is only ONE aspect of the driver, and you should consider other features before making a decision based just on pwer handling.

John
Old Nov 6, 2008 | 03:48 PM
  #13  
kirk tarrant's Avatar
50 Watt CAFz'r
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 191
i had my focal access 6.5 on my 4 channel infinity bridged to 2 channels, some were around 200 rms a side and they loved it
Old Nov 6, 2008 | 04:44 PM
  #14  
Sasha's Avatar
1000 Watt CAFz'r
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,418
What I presume he means is how much a voice coil can handle thermally. And he asked for coaxials, but since I see a lot of component sets being thrown around, I will have to say that DLS Nobelium has a 3" voice coil, so imagine that. It seems at least 500 wrms a side is in order. Thats pretty funny.

Last edited by Sasha; Nov 6, 2008 at 04:46 PM.
Old Nov 7, 2008 | 12:00 AM
  #15  
andrewsfm's Avatar
Thread Starter
50 Watt CAFz'r
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 320
Well I've got a JBL 4 channel amp rated for 100W channel at 4 ohms, and about 130W channel at 2 ohms.

I know it's not alot, but I'm just looking for something that will take all that power and utilize the capacity of the amp to throw out some more volume, without blowing and having to swap them out.

This is going to be my 3rd purchase of mids/highs.
Old Nov 7, 2008 | 05:09 AM
  #16  
jonesbrooklyn's Avatar
I suck a bozzack for a nickel
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 2,679
Originally Posted by andrewsfm
Anyone know of a pair of 5.25 coaxials that can handle more than 100W RMS?
Preferably less than 2.25" mounting depth.
Would prefer 2 ohms, but 4 is fine too.
Check this link out. Don't think you'll have the money to spend on these though. Just copy and paste the link bro.

http://mobile.bostonacoustics.com/car/car_product.aspx?category_id=14&family_id=136&prod uct_id=401

Or even this one is good as well. Copy and paste the link as well.

http://mobile.bostonacoustics.com/car/car_product.aspx?category_id=14&family_id=20&produ ct_id=297

Last edited by jonesbrooklyn; Nov 7, 2008 at 05:11 AM.
Old Nov 7, 2008 | 09:18 PM
  #17  
andrewsfm's Avatar
Thread Starter
50 Watt CAFz'r
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 320
Those looks really cool.

Too bad they're too deep for my door mounting depth, and apparently cost an arm and a leg even on ebay.
Old Nov 8, 2008 | 05:22 PM
  #18  
BigRedGuy's Avatar
2000 Watt CAFz'r
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 2,383
Lightbulb

One thing nobody has pointed out so far is the fact that those factory ratings are based on feeding the speakers a full range signal. If you take a closer look at the specs they probably start at 50hz or so up to 20Khz. In a properly set-up system your 5.25" fronts are going to be high-pass filtered much higher than that. Typical installs without front midbass drivers are set at at least 80hz, if you have mercy on the speakers you might set it as high as 120hz.

I have usually found that a 5.25" component set or coax can handle at least twice the rated power if all the sub and most of the midbass is removed from the signal. I have JL XR series components in my work van rolled off at 400hz and feed them 150w no problem. However, I also use 2 Orion MB6 midbass drivers in each door for the bottom end, cutting them off at 80hz and letting my subs handle the grunt work.

While midbass frequencies do form part of the stereo image, some people find getting midbass from larger (6 X 9") drivers in the rear of the vehicle is acceptable. Some others find that the image is distorted or 'mushy' for lack of a better word at the moment and they either use a larger (6.5") driver up front or add dedicated midbass drivers. Unfortunately, either one of these solutions adds to the difficulty and cost of doing the install.....

HTH
Old Nov 8, 2008 | 05:46 PM
  #19  
zzzzzzz's Avatar
4000 Watt CAFz'r
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 4,643
Originally Posted by MR2NR
Morel for sure, I am not sure about the mounting depth issue but will look into that for you when I make it into the shop later today. (I am supposed to be putting siding on right now).
love it
Old Nov 8, 2008 | 07:23 PM
  #20  
andrewsfm's Avatar
Thread Starter
50 Watt CAFz'r
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 320
Originally Posted by BigRedGuy
While midbass frequencies do form part of the stereo image, some people find getting midbass from larger (6 X 9") drivers in the rear of the vehicle is acceptable. Some others find that the image is distorted or 'mushy' for lack of a better word at the moment and they either use a larger (6.5") driver up front or add dedicated midbass drivers. Unfortunately, either one of these solutions adds to the difficulty and cost of doing the install.....
HTH
I currently use 6x9s on the rear deck but am swapping them out with 6.25's since I read an article saying how they distort the bass, because their oval shape has the cone restricted by the surrounds at the far narrow ends. Push a 6x9 upward from behind and you can see the resistance on the ends. The argument is that apparently the only reason they even make oval speakers are to have a factory drop-in replacement for cars. High end home audio speakers are usually nothing but round.

I wanted to use all 6.25s but my front doors will not allow the mounting hole size or depth without some modifications I can't be bothered with to do, so I gotta go with 5.25s.

Right now, there's practically no bass except from my sub, and I have a gap in the mid-bass I'd like to fill.

I've tried going without rear fill, and it just doesn't sound right.

Last edited by andrewsfm; Nov 8, 2008 at 07:29 PM.

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:38 AM.