General Discussion General discussion about all things car audio, from pioneer, orion, alpine and eclipse.

Opinions on 8W7?

Old Mar 27, 2008 | 11:52 AM
  #1  
Harasym91's Avatar
Thread Starter
50 Watt CAFz'r
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 108
Opinions on 8W7?

I've decided to get 3 8" subs, and now I'm deciding between the Soundsplinter RL-i 8 or the JL 8W7. I've heard great things about both by I myself have never heard an 8" driver so I'm a bit skeptical. I'm getting an 88 Chrysler LeBaron and am now trying to decide how to get 3 8" subs in the car nicely..I would like to find a way to put them in the actual car rather than the trunk. Another concern I have is my amp. Right now I have a 15" sub with an Earthquake PHD5000 and they worked together nicely, but now I'm just wondering if it will sound good with 3 subs. Basically I have three questions:

1. What would be the best way to fit 3 8" subs into a car in ported boxes?

2. What would be the best way to wire these three subs to my monoblock amp (selling isn't an option because my gf bought it for me lol)?

3. Which are the better of the two kinds of subs?

Thanks for the help.
Old Mar 27, 2008 | 04:23 PM
  #2  
gumby!'s Avatar
--SPECIAL ED--
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 482
keep what you have!
Old Mar 27, 2008 | 04:27 PM
  #3  
Harasym91's Avatar
Thread Starter
50 Watt CAFz'r
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 108
well the reason i was trying to get new subs is because of how small they are..my sub right now is the jbl w15 gti in a 6.5cuft box tuned to 35Hz..so it's pretty big. its the 3rd box ive made for it and im finally happy with how it sounds, but now im getting a smaller car. i also would like to have some hard punches with the subs rather than the rolling bass. 8's just seem like more of a convenience. why is it a bad idea?
Old Mar 27, 2008 | 07:17 PM
  #4  
Harasym91's Avatar
Thread Starter
50 Watt CAFz'r
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 108
buuuuuump
Old Mar 28, 2008 | 05:58 AM
  #5  
Hardwrkr's Avatar
2000 Watt CAFz'r
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 3,542
Keep the JBL and put it in a sealed enclosure if you need to get some trunk back. It is a better sounding driver IMO.
Old Mar 28, 2008 | 07:36 AM
  #6  
Tom.F.1's Avatar
1000 Watt CAFz'r
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,217
You'd need more amps and crossovers, but i'd keep the 15" sub for 20-60hz and use the 8"s for midbass, 60-150 hz.

You won't get lows from 8's.
Old Mar 28, 2008 | 08:17 AM
  #7  
MTT's Avatar
MTT
--SPECIAL ED--
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,325
or keep the 15 and IB it to save some room if thats a viable option?.....if not, then sell me the 15 for cheap

Last edited by MTT; Mar 28, 2008 at 08:23 AM.
Old Mar 28, 2008 | 08:39 AM
  #8  
gumby!'s Avatar
--SPECIAL ED--
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 482
Originally Posted by Tom.F.1
You'd need more amps and crossovers, but i'd keep the 15" sub for 20-60hz and use the 8"s for midbass, 60-150 hz.

You won't get lows from 8's.
Really, thats interesting cause mine do, they play from 20-140 HZ!
Old Mar 28, 2008 | 08:59 AM
  #9  
df.dima's Avatar
500 Watt CAFz'r
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 643
and why the hell would you use a sub for midbass duties?
Old Mar 28, 2008 | 09:04 AM
  #10  
MTT's Avatar
MTT
--SPECIAL ED--
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,325
Originally Posted by df.dima
and why the hell would you use a sub for midbass duties?
I think the confusion comes from size, a lot of people think bigger means lower so smaller has to mean higher.

a lot of 8's will play lower than some 15's, all depends on their design and purpose.

A blanket statement like "15's for lows, 8's for midbass, 4's for midrange and 1's for tweets" is just wrong. IMO

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:54 AM.