General Discussion General discussion about all things car audio, from pioneer, orion, alpine and eclipse.

Opinions on Rockford Symmetry EXP2?

Old Mar 19, 2004 | 12:34 AM
  #181  
152.5's Avatar
500 Watt CAFz'r
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 570
Post

Originally posted by DWVW:
The LSX2 will not invert a channel, that's what you need to do to run multiple amps on a single coil.

On ALma's install, to fit 64 subs the box was not a flat wall, the Phase shifters allowed you to adjust the phase (not just 180 which you could just flip the polarity with the speaker wires) but infinitely up to 180 degrees I believe. She used the phase shift controllers to ensure all sound waves were in alignment at the mic position

Good night, back at this thread tommorrow [img]graemlins/thumb.gif[/img]
cool dereck! i knew it was something like that. Thanks for clearing a little bit of that up for me. [img]graemlins/thumb.gif[/img]
Old Mar 19, 2004 | 09:31 AM
  #183  
slow/n\low's Avatar
500 Watt CAFz'r
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 866
Post

Yes Derek understands

So now I hope that we all understand that we can be wrong

Moral of the story "processors are used in SPL"


[img]graemlins/thumb.gif[/img] the end......
Old Mar 19, 2004 | 10:03 AM
  #184  
Father Yuli's Avatar
Level 3 Supporter
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 11,604
Post

yah i guess i overshot myself, 'processors' are used but signal boosters and eq's are not.
Old Mar 19, 2004 | 10:03 AM
  #185  
Father Yuli's Avatar
Level 3 Supporter
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 11,604
Post

i could be wrong but im yet to see an spl vehicle that uses symmetry, and im not talking about something from the far past. i wanna see something recent.
Old Mar 19, 2004 | 10:36 AM
  #187  
slow/n\low's Avatar
500 Watt CAFz'r
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 866
Post

The funny thing again tinted is that the orignal post had nothing to do with SPL.


His question was not who uses them in SPL, he just wanted opinions on the product [img]tongue.gif[/img]

not once did anyone ever say that the epx has or was used in SPL or for that matter is good for spl.

Why did you even bring up SPL? I dont see that question in 8 pages?
Old Mar 19, 2004 | 10:41 AM
  #188  
Father Yuli's Avatar
Level 3 Supporter
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 11,604
Post

your answer shall be found on the first 2 pages. let me summarize. the kid asked about the unit, i said a good deck can do it, then someone either u or george said i was stupid and that symmetry is a good unit, i said that i do spl and it's useless to me so i could be wrong. then the rest of this threat went on with u george and dwvw telling me that symmetry along with other processors are used in spl. thats pretty much it? Both DWVW and George had good points and did infact showed me something i wasnt sure about........now i just want to know what is the purpose of your replies? just to keep ******* me? like your last post was totallly pointless, b/c i've already stated (like 2 pages ago) that both George and DWVW were right and i was wrong? so yah, answer me that
Old Mar 19, 2004 | 10:52 AM
  #190  
slow/n\low's Avatar
500 Watt CAFz'r
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 866
Post

Yes Tinted I will correct myself, George did say that "if Tinted were smart he would no how the EPX2 could inprove his system and make it louder"

Also what I am confused about is if you are into SPL and the EPX to your understanding is for SQ, then why would you even answer or be involved in the original discussion?

And that fact you said you own an EPX on page 1 and then later down you had to ask for clarification on what the EPX is, makes me think that you dont have one and dont even know what it does.

Now run to a web site and look up the info on the EPX so you can make people think you actually do own one. Cause I call bull****.

now, put together 3 questions is sentence form and I will be happy to answer any of them.

[ March 19, 2004, 11:55 AM: Message edited by: slow/n\low ]

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:15 AM.