P2 go boom
07-30-2004, 12:07 PM
#71
500 Watt CAFz'r
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 587
Originally posted by mike bisson:
</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by Dann0:
I personally think the sub might have been defective from the get go, or the new Punch subs suck ***...you choose. I choose the latter...
</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by Dann0:
I personally think the sub might have been defective from the get go, or the new Punch subs suck ***...you choose. I choose the latter...
and as for you Mike, for a man in your position, grow up. "Or maybe you suck ***?" Thats something I would expect to hear from some punk kid.
[ July 30, 2004, 01:11 PM: Message edited by: Dann0 ]
07-30-2004, 12:10 PM
#72
500 Watt CAFz'r
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 587
Originally posted by Tinted:
Dan your amp doesnt do 2500 rms. if it did then Barclay's D2's did 4000rms, and then my D3's do what??? 6000 rms?
Chris' meter was not working right when he did that test.
Dan your amp doesnt do 2500 rms. if it did then Barclay's D2's did 4000rms, and then my D3's do what??? 6000 rms?
Chris' meter was not working right when he did that test.
birth sheet from Planet Audio says 2122WRMS @ 2ohms.
[ July 30, 2004, 01:13 PM: Message edited by: Dann0 ]
07-30-2004, 12:42 PM
#73
birth sheet from Planet Audio says 2122WRMS @ 2ohms.
or how about D3's? what do they do? My birth certificate says 5000 RMS.
[ July 30, 2004, 01:44 PM: Message edited by: Tinted ]
07-30-2004, 01:45 PM
#74
500 Watt CAFz'r
Join Date: Aug 2001
Posts: 866
Originally posted by mike bisson:
</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by Dann0:
I personally think the sub might have been defective from the get go, or the new Punch subs suck ***...you choose. I choose the latter...
</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by Dann0:
I personally think the sub might have been defective from the get go, or the new Punch subs suck ***...you choose. I choose the latter...
07-30-2004, 05:48 PM
#77
50 Watt CAFz'r
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 146
Originally posted by JohnVroom:
total harmonic distortion (THD): Of a signal, the ratio of (a) the sum of the powers of all harmonic frequencies above the fundamental frequency to (b) the power of the fundamental frequency. Note 1: The THD is usually expressed in dB. Note 2: Measurements for calculating the THD are made at the output of a device under specified conditions.
Again; clipping is not a harmonic distortion
as I think about it?. I can make an argument that clipping reduces THD by limiting the amount of harmonics that can be produced
total harmonic distortion (THD): Of a signal, the ratio of (a) the sum of the powers of all harmonic frequencies above the fundamental frequency to (b) the power of the fundamental frequency. Note 1: The THD is usually expressed in dB. Note 2: Measurements for calculating the THD are made at the output of a device under specified conditions.
Again; clipping is not a harmonic distortion
as I think about it?. I can make an argument that clipping reduces THD by limiting the amount of harmonics that can be produced
[ July 30, 2004, 08:18 PM: Message edited by: hobbes26 ]
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
