General Discussion General discussion about all things car audio, from pioneer, orion, alpine and eclipse.

Port calculator w*h

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 31, 2010 | 03:11 PM
  #31  
Lord Huggington's Avatar
Thread Starter
1000 Watt CAFz'r
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,462
1 18" sub/28mm x-max @ 33.87HZ:

Minimum Area 145.47"

Length of a side
for a square vent 12.06"

UUUUHhhhh??? Fi says 12-16 per cube..... what does this mean?
Old Jul 31, 2010 | 04:04 PM
  #32  
veeman's Avatar
2000 Watt CAFz'r
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 2,455
It means fi, like every other manufacturer doesn't want to scare off consumers with the actual port dimensions that a properly designed sub system requires.
Old Jul 31, 2010 | 04:07 PM
  #33  
DeadlySones's Avatar
2000 Watt CAFz'r
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 3,751
^^^ exactly, & it can play in a bigger box than they want to let on (9-12 cubes might scare some buyers away, but if you want the lows...) using that port area. Then you have your 12-16in per cube.

This is why some people are louder with smaller subs. They are able to build the proper enclosure.

Is this a BTL?

Last edited by DeadlySones; Jul 31, 2010 at 04:16 PM.
Old Jul 31, 2010 | 04:15 PM
  #34  
veeman's Avatar
2000 Watt CAFz'r
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 2,455
^^possibly...they do recommend 5-10 cubes (assuming a btl 18 or a q), though at 5 cubes it would be off a little. Anyway, that's optimum, and unless you have gobs of space you're going to have to compromise a little.

Last edited by veeman; Aug 1, 2010 at 02:07 AM.
Old Jul 31, 2010 | 06:04 PM
  #35  
Lord Huggington's Avatar
Thread Starter
1000 Watt CAFz'r
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,462
BTL 18. I want one sub & one amp, something cheap & really loud.

For 145.47"^3 port area, how big can the box be? 140"^3 = 8.75cf3 per 16"^3. How much port area is too much?

I have 10.40625 cf3 as a sealed 38 x 20.5 x 29.

18.5" x 7.87" port = 145.595... which gives me 8.81 cubes @ 38.54-56 HZ (17 actual/calculated 20 port length), 16.51 square inches per.

Why do ported boxes suck so much?
Old Jul 31, 2010 | 06:07 PM
  #36  
Lord Huggington's Avatar
Thread Starter
1000 Watt CAFz'r
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,462
Does the minimum mean it won't reach full excursion in any airspace without 145.47" port area?
Old Jul 31, 2010 | 06:26 PM
  #37  
Lord Huggington's Avatar
Thread Starter
1000 Watt CAFz'r
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,462
The port would need to be 13.61 x 10.7 that just doesn't make sense. How could a 12" need a minimum vent diameter of 7.91"?
Old Aug 1, 2010 | 10:43 PM
  #38  
Dukk's Avatar
Administrator
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 16,860
12"? I thought it was an 18"? Anyway, it all has to do with diplacement over time and how that relates to the air speed within the vent. I haven't bothered to figure out the speed limit they are using but common rules of thumb limits it to 0.9Mach to avoid having a noisy port with a lot of compression.

Contrary to what many people think, you CAN have too much port area, but most people except SPL competitors won't run into this.
Old Aug 2, 2010 | 01:20 AM
  #39  
Lord Huggington's Avatar
Thread Starter
1000 Watt CAFz'r
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,462
Yes, it's for an 18, but even for a 12 it seemed too high. Sorry, that was minimum area, not diameter.

"...diplacement over time...", as in motor-force?

Does 145.47 square inches of port mean that around 9 cubes would work best? 9 x 16 = 144.

Would a sub with lower x-max work better? The BL calculates to around 93 minimum vent area.

What's the xmax on the BTL without the high x-max coil?

This box seems like it's going to be a hell of a lot longer.
Old Aug 2, 2010 | 02:10 AM
  #40  
Lord Huggington's Avatar
Thread Starter
1000 Watt CAFz'r
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,462
Can someone design me a correct port area for 30-35hz with 38w x 20.5h x 29+1d? Both sub & port on 38w.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:34 AM.