RE Audio
12-22-2005, 05:03 PM
#33
b/c its the most unefficient sub in the world. in my own personal testing it got creamed by every other sub that i own and tested against. it even lost to the lower model RE SX.
[ December 22, 2005, 06:04 PM: Message edited by: Prolifik ]
[ December 22, 2005, 06:04 PM: Message edited by: Prolifik ]
12-22-2005, 08:04 PM
#36
Originally posted by Prolifik:
thats because we know what we are doin with these subs, cept for me ofcourse, i hate MT's.
thats because we know what we are doin with these subs, cept for me ofcourse, i hate MT's.
12-23-2005, 08:55 AM
#38
Arock had them in a wall. They are good for the wall. try them in a box for a street class and let me know how they do, u will see what im saying. MT's hate back pressure, it totally kills their performance.
[ December 23, 2005, 09:56 AM: Message edited by: Prolifik ]
[ December 23, 2005, 09:56 AM: Message edited by: Prolifik ]
12-23-2005, 10:29 AM
#39
Originally posted by Prolifik:
b/c its the most unefficient sub in the world. in my own personal testing it got creamed by every other sub that i own and tested against. it even lost to the lower model RE SX.
b/c its the most unefficient sub in the world. in my own personal testing it got creamed by every other sub that i own and tested against. it even lost to the lower model RE SX.
