General Discussion General discussion about all things car audio, from pioneer, orion, alpine and eclipse.

subsonic filter

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 20, 2005 | 09:07 AM
  #23  
Coffeyman's Avatar
500 Watt CAFz'r
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 718
Post

ok...

so i have a subsonic filter on my amp...don't really know how it works though....i usually just keep it turned off. but i'd like to try it out to see what type of a difference it makes. what frequency should i set it at? and then what music/tones should i play? and what should i look/listen for?
by turning on the subsonic filter i'm guessing that i'm using more power on the amp right?
Old Sep 20, 2005 | 10:19 AM
  #25  
Starterwiz's Avatar
500 Watt CAFz'r
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 870
Post

You should notice a bit tighter bass with the filter on. At least if you have a ported box.
If you're using a sealed box, you may notice a bit less low frequency extension.
You should be able to see less cone movement with the filter on....and if you don't hear less bass, but see less movement, then leave it on, cause that means it's working.

It will actually cause the amp to use less power.
Old Sep 20, 2005 | 10:38 AM
  #26  
Miluni's Avatar
G.A.P.
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 287
Post

Is this any different form the infrasonic filters that come with some amps?

Is this filter a good idea to have in a SQ car?

[ September 20, 2005, 11:39 AM: Message edited by: Miluni ]
Old Sep 20, 2005 | 02:44 PM
  #28  
Starterwiz's Avatar
500 Watt CAFz'r
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 870
Post

Do elaborate.
I'm sure for simplicity, I've left out a few stipulations, but statements like "I disagree, cause I've never needed it" add nothing but confusion to an already technical topic.
Perhaps you've reached a plateeu that "what I've got is as good as it gets", and have no desire to push the envelope.
You already stated that SS filter's can save power, but how is that possible if there is no information to filter.
Seems a bit contradictory.
Old Sep 20, 2005 | 07:33 PM
  #29  
Eli47's Avatar
500 Watt CAFz'r
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 952
Angry

Originally posted by Miluni:
Is this any different form the infrasonic filters that come with some amps?

Is this filter a good idea to have in a SQ car?
What are the chances of you people NOT using the term "SUBSONIC"(below speed of sound) ANYMORE, WHEN IT COMES TO SOUND!?
The correct term is "INFRA-SONIC" .(below hearing range of humans)
I know alot of people here have been in the industry for so long, you should know better than to go with the flow, and correct people that erroneously use the term "subsonic". (write your MLA, and senators to abolish this term in our industry.)
Old Sep 20, 2005 | 08:20 PM
  #30  
Starterwiz's Avatar
500 Watt CAFz'r
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 870
Post

The odds of changing the terminology that 90% of the world understands is pretty small, I think.

Since almost every amp made calls their 20Hz high pass filter a "subsonic filter", I doubt if you will change their minds.

R.A Heinlein was using the term "subsonics" to describe tones below the threshold of human hearing in 1942 when he started out writing the best science fiction of his day.

There are many other misnomers in the scientific world (planetary nebulas have nothing at all to do with planets), but the terms stick, because everyone knows what you are talking about.

Go with the flow of evolution, or fight a losing battle forever.

I ponder why almost every sub amp of substance has a sub-sonic filter, unless the engineers subjectively feel a substantial need to eliminate the subsonics from their product. Perhaps they feel that their stuff would be considered substantially substandard without it, and to include it would be sublime.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:25 AM.