Very very interesting move..
Guest
Posts: n/a
Originally posted by Moe Sab:
IMO, this is a very bad move on Wayne's part... the whole concept of competition is to hit as high a number as possible, based on equipment, vehicle and design.
IMO, this is a very bad move on Wayne's part... the whole concept of competition is to hit as high a number as possible, based on equipment, vehicle and design.
IMO the best move Wayne has made in the last 5 years.
Guest
Posts: n/a
[img]graemlins/thumb.gif[/img]
[ November 26, 2003, 12:02 PM: Message edited by: Back-2-Bassiks ]
Originally posted by SPL2k:
now instead of RF, MTX, or Kicker having to sponsor ONE competitor with 48, 72, or 96 or whatever number of amps, they can sponsor 2 or 3 competitors on that SAME budget.
thats one way it will help!
trust me...NO manufacturer WANTS to build quads (they dont sell at the retail level) but right now they HAVE to just to stay competitive in dB Drag.
now instead of RF, MTX, or Kicker having to sponsor ONE competitor with 48, 72, or 96 or whatever number of amps, they can sponsor 2 or 3 competitors on that SAME budget.
thats one way it will help!
trust me...NO manufacturer WANTS to build quads (they dont sell at the retail level) but right now they HAVE to just to stay competitive in dB Drag.
I don't think it's a bad move at all. I'm betting the manufacturers are loving it, and that's better for us.
If people wanna whine and complain, and leave because the rules don't suit them, then so be it.
I mean you can't make everyone happy (competitors, manufacturers, audio shops, audio teams, judges)_but you can sure as hell try.
If people wanna whine and complain, and leave because the rules don't suit them, then so be it.
I mean you can't make everyone happy (competitors, manufacturers, audio shops, audio teams, judges)_but you can sure as hell try.
Guest
Posts: n/a
I am not even going to try to be an SPL guy here, but I think its an overall good move for all the competitors. I think that db Drag will get more competitors out if they don't have to go against someone who has 20-30k wrapped up in gear.
I understand the manufactures point of view on this as well. If they was to keep supporting db Drag, then db Drag has to do somthing more to support them. Having custom drivers built for your serious competitors isn't a very good buisness plan. Its a very small number of people who will actually custom order them, and when they do they probably get them at a deal as they are either sponsored or in "pro". I don't think you will see many "rookies" out there with quads.
If it can't be bought from a store, then why should it be allowed against all the other mass produced product?
I understand the manufactures point of view on this as well. If they was to keep supporting db Drag, then db Drag has to do somthing more to support them. Having custom drivers built for your serious competitors isn't a very good buisness plan. Its a very small number of people who will actually custom order them, and when they do they probably get them at a deal as they are either sponsored or in "pro". I don't think you will see many "rookies" out there with quads.
If it can't be bought from a store, then why should it be allowed against all the other mass produced product?
Woulndt it be easier for everyone if they onyl said you cant run more then 2 amps per sub? Or something along those lines?
THEN, they could eventually ban amplifiers that make over "x" amount of power.
THEN, they could eventually ban amplifiers that make over "x" amount of power.
