Subs.
05-06-2007, 03:20 PM
#14
Guest
Posts: n/a
Originally Posted by SPLN00B2
They dont make 9915s anymore as well.
Oh well, they've upped to the Z line.
Regardless, no one meantioned the subs were to be bought new. So a 9915 is still attainable.
I geuss if you were buying new and wanted the DD sub, you would be stuck with a Z15. That might break the bank though.
Regardless of your choice, all the subs mentioned are far superior to the alpine type r's.
And again, are you looking for 3000-4000 rms or peak?
Also what amps?
05-06-2007, 03:34 PM
#15
Guest
Posts: n/a
Originally Posted by Mat-Romain
Oh well, they've upped to the Z line.
Regardless, no one meantioned the subs were to be bought new. So a 9915 is still attainable.
I geuss if you were buying new and wanted the DD sub, you would be stuck with a Z15. That might break the bank though.
Regardless of your choice, all the subs mentioned are far superior to the alpine type r's.
And again, are you looking for 3000-4000 rms or peak?
Also what amps?
Regardless, no one meantioned the subs were to be bought new. So a 9915 is still attainable.
I geuss if you were buying new and wanted the DD sub, you would be stuck with a Z15. That might break the bank though.
Regardless of your choice, all the subs mentioned are far superior to the alpine type r's.
And again, are you looking for 3000-4000 rms or peak?
Also what amps?
05-06-2007, 05:20 PM
#16
Guest
Posts: n/a
Originally Posted by SPLN00B2
No, instead you would buy a 9515g with composite cone.
well, i geuss i shouldnt of voiced an opinion, because u clearly know a lot more then me. from what i have seen and heard, the 9500's dont hold up to well with that much power. but i dont know and dont follow dd at all, mabey they changed something... u seem to be the expert, so ill go along with ur opinion.
05-06-2007, 06:09 PM
#17
50 Watt CAFz'r
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 130
From my understanding the 9900 was a 9500 except with a different cone. This may or may not be correct, but that was my understanding. Which is why the 9500 with the new cone option is comparable, as it is pretty much a 9900 with a different name plate 
05-06-2007, 06:10 PM
#18
Guest
Posts: n/a
Originally Posted by sundownz
From my understanding the 9900 was a 9500 except with a different cone. This may or may not be correct, but that was my understanding. Which is why the 9500 with the new cone option is comparable, as it is pretty much a 9900 with a different name plate
