General SQ General discussion of Sound Quality related issues.

3 way vs 2 way

Old Aug 14, 2004 | 05:29 PM
  #1  
Seahag's Avatar
Thread Starter
1000 Watt CAFz'r
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 1,239
Post

Recently I`ve put together a 3 way front end mainly to get better bass response and image up front.

I`m starting to realize that the equipment needed and the time to set it up isn`t worth the effort.

Midbass speakers
Sound deadening doors
Deticated amp
wires etc
set up time
Phase problems
good crossover
eq maybe

For what?

As a test.. I recently unhooked my midbasses and increases the xover point on the sub. It doesn't sound that bad. imagine a 4" component set and a sub. It sounds a bit weak but gets louder
for some reason.

Most problems I`ve been having are getting the midbasses to blend in properly.
I`ve tried setting the crossovers, gains for each midbass (bridged 4 channel)

The response is not bad. It images ok, and bass lines are pretty sweet but I`m not getting the kick I thought I would, so most time I increase the sub for that 'kick'. Then the sub becomes localized... which I`ve been trying to move away from.


After all that, there's phase problems.


Maybe a bit out of my league trying to set something like this up

Thoughts? Experiences?
Old Aug 15, 2004 | 06:33 AM
  #2  
Diabolik's Avatar
50 Watt CAFz'r
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 60
Post

I almost went 3 way, but I was convinced by others on this board and other boards that two way is the way to go. They were right [img]smile.gif[/img]

I have heard all too often the problems you are running into with a 3 way. I am running a full active Focal K2Power setup, 6.5" driver plus tweeter, and the only thing I am missing frequency wise is low bass, because I have no sub yet The Focal tweeters can play pretty reliably into the 2 KHz range and the woofers can play pretty high as well. They play awesome mid bass too (the first set of 6.5" components I have ever heard that actually hammer my chest the way a sub does). I spent a LOT on those Powers, plus the Eclipse 8454 and the ARC amp, but I believe that money is better invested in a high end 2 way.

IMO, allocate your cash to a really good 2 way set and you will be very happy.

Install is everything, install is everything.

Repeat 10 times [img]smile.gif[/img]

-D
Old Aug 15, 2004 | 07:22 AM
  #3  
fozzz's Avatar
1000 Watt CAFz'r
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,339
Post

I agree. I've tried 3-way sets before and havent found them to be any better to my ears. I find that it's easier to place and eq the 2-way fronts which means better overall sound in my car. Having a dedicated midbass driver would be nice, but since I'm using a Scan Speak 7" I dont think I have many problems in that area.

Stick with a good 2-way [img]graemlins/thumb.gif[/img]
Old Aug 15, 2004 | 10:32 AM
  #5  
mike bisson's Avatar
1000 Watt CAFz'r
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,156
Post

^^^^ sage advice.

Three way systems, can be very good; however, they do take alot of work and experiance to make them sound good.

Two way systems are quite simple and do not require much effort to sound good. I have used both successfully. In my current car, I am using a two-way setup that works very well for me.
Old Aug 15, 2004 | 11:45 AM
  #7  
Sassmaster's Avatar
Merry Christmass from CCA
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 2,579
Post

My next car will be 3 way, I've seen some interesting things recently with putting 3" domes in the A pillars, I may try it with the 3" dome on top, the tweeter below it, and the midbass in the doors... any thoughts?
Old Aug 15, 2004 | 03:29 PM
  #9  
JohnVroom's Avatar
Yankee
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 3,599
Post

Everything Dukk said was in line with my opinions. A 3 way comp set has advantages and should get louder, and sound better, than a similar 2 way from the same manufacturer.

The 2 ways advantage is simplicity, only one crossover range to deal with and the blending of 4 drivers vice 6. It is easier to go active with a 2 way, it consumes less internal volume than a 3 way (for me it was "so where am I going to stick this 8 inch mid-bass"). So yeah 2 way is easier than 3 way and for some may be the only way to go.

Like Dukk I chose 3 way comp set, a good 3 way system is incredible.
Old Aug 15, 2004 | 03:54 PM
  #10  
Diabolik's Avatar
50 Watt CAFz'r
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 60
Post

Yeah, true. An active 3 way has the potential to sound better than an active 2 way, but getting good sound out of an active 2 way is a task, lots of tuning time. A 3 way would be much more time consuming and much more difficult.

Plus, good point about space. You need the room to put all these drivers.

Everyone has room for 2 pair. 3 pair... bit harder.

-D

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:59 PM.