Originally Posted by BradSk88
(Post 642001)
From what I read (sorry I can't remember where I read it.) there will be "limited on-deck functionality" if you don't want to use the single din controller.
|
I don't disagree.
Alpine has given up on the SQ crowd in favour of the iPod crowd. This is just a shiny toy to keep us placated. |
Originally Posted by avidedtr
(Post 641977)
I'm looking forward to ARC piece instead. The rockford piece was probably delayed another year after the release of the bitone and they saw all the features it had.
Guys keep in mind your processor won't make everything better. So don't expect the world with the H800 frankly I'm expecting it to be almost the same as the H700/701 or a new set plagued problems. |
I didn't see anything about the arc piece. Whats the scoop?
|
Originally Posted by AAAAAAA
(Post 642009)
I didn't see anything about the arc piece. Whats the scoop?
|
Originally Posted by AAAAAAA
(Post 642009)
I didn't see anything about the arc piece. Whats the scoop?
Originally Posted by Dukk
(Post 642005)
Well it goes without saying the Arc piece will eclipse everything else :rolleyes: but I like to consider all options. At this time I have not found a unit that suits my needs more than the BitOne though but the RF one might. Hopefully it's not as flakey as the 360.2 was.
Dukk I too found the 360.2, was flaky with BT modules and memory saving issues. I found it sounded fair and lacked processing power. Bitone by far sonically better and overall easy to control but I couldn't get beyond the issue I had with 3 units. I'm looking forward to all the new units and hearing feedback from the SQ public. I'm not jumping into a new processor until it's proven reliable. |
Originally Posted by avidedtr
(Post 642028)
I have more faith in ArcAudio products then say alpine, rockford, and audison.
|
Originally Posted by Dukk
(Post 642038)
Why? :dunno:
|
Originally Posted by Dukk
(Post 642038)
Why? :dunno:
|
...not t mention they've been very solid brands for 30-40 years now, also I keep hearing Alpine isn't into SQ anymore??? Just because a company offers real life usable features and is smart enough to cater to large markets does not mean they aren't interested in SQ. Their "SQ" oriented decks (cda-117 for example, have upgraded DAC's (24 bit burr brown), USB direct digital inputs (for ipod's that are used as hard drives with wav or lossless files), 4 volt outs, lots of tuning capabilities, and specs that are as good or better than the best of just 5-10 years ago. I'll admit I miss a few features that my 9835/33 had (variable colour, motorized face, and the expanded tuning of bass engine plus (the only SQ feature I may add)), but it also lacked the 24 bit DAC's (not a big issue to me but it is an SQ feature) and digital usb input, and it was almost twice the price of a cda 117 only 5 years ago.
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:00 PM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands