General SQ General discussion of Sound Quality related issues.

Any truth to this statement?

Old Nov 6, 2003 | 06:37 PM
  #1  
lemonlime's Avatar
Thread Starter
500 Watt CAFz'r
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 756
Post

Just thought this was an interesting claim that may have some truth to it. Anyone care to add or elaborate on this?

(Taken from the Image Dynamics website)

"The IDQ V.2 performance is a result of sound engineering practice and give up nothing in the way of performance to the so called high output wide surround subwoofers. Just like a larger engine produces more useable power a subwoofer with more displacement produces more output. Displacement for a subwoofer is simply cone diameter multiplied by linear Xmax peak to peak (bore X stroke). Since very little of the surround of a long excursion subwoofer actually contributes to the displacement of the subwoofer their reduced cone diameter results in lower displacement requiring an increase in linear Xmax just to equal the displacement of the IDQ V.2 subwoofers."
Old Nov 6, 2003 | 07:02 PM
  #3  
Gmac's Avatar
1000 Watt CAFz'r
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 1,089
Post

Well said [img]graemlins/thumb.gif[/img]
Old Nov 12, 2003 | 10:34 PM
  #4  
ChevySQ's Avatar
50 Watt CAFz'r
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 278
Post

I totally agree with Dereck, because that is the way it is.... Most manufacturers will make the driver look that way to give a false impression that the thing whales, when i reality, the Pyramid 10 you can buy at London Drugs, for $20 will squash the MASSIVE 15 that you just picked up for the afforable and UNBEATABLE price of $700

What ever you buy, I found a link that will help most guys get an idea of what the might be able to attain before they spend cash, Heres the link:

Old Nov 12, 2003 | 10:35 PM
  #5  
ChevySQ's Avatar
50 Watt CAFz'r
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 278
Post

Link never showed on last post, I will try it again :

www.conceptconcept.com/download/dB_formula.pdf
Old Nov 13, 2003 | 02:18 PM
  #6  
formulator's Avatar
0 Watt CAFz'r
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 11
Post

just look at the drivers xmax rating. If it has a fat surround and a low xmax then it's all show and no go but if it has a fat surround and good xmax numbers then it really does displace a lot and that's why it has a large surround.
Old Nov 17, 2003 | 01:23 PM
  #8  
Dave's Avatar
50 Watt CAFz'r
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 327
Post

Who made the sub with the tall surround? I think that was a good idea.. Less cone area wasted with decent xmax
Old Nov 17, 2003 | 02:38 PM
  #10  
Chadxton's Avatar
2000 Watt CAFz'r
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 2,707
Post

IDMAX? [img]tongue.gif[/img]

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:46 PM.