Focal FP2.150 vs Zapco C2K 2.0x
Focal FP2.150 vs Zapco C2K 2.0x
Hey Everyone,
I'll make this quick..... The amp will be powering a single 12" Sub, able to handle 600 Watts RMS. I'm lookin into the two amps in question, the Focal FP2.150 or the Zapco C2K 2.0X? So what should I choose?
My main concern with the zapco is that its only rated for bridged 200 Watts RMS @ 4ohm... but i hear they're stupidily under rated. How much underrated? The focal is 400 Watts RMS.
What i'm looking for in sound? Well i'm not looking to rattle the neighborhood, i want a tight amp that kicks hard and quick. Both of these amps have a high Dampening Factor. Focal >500 and Zapco >900.
Any comments are greatly appreciated... let the battle begin!
thanks
I'll make this quick..... The amp will be powering a single 12" Sub, able to handle 600 Watts RMS. I'm lookin into the two amps in question, the Focal FP2.150 or the Zapco C2K 2.0X? So what should I choose?
My main concern with the zapco is that its only rated for bridged 200 Watts RMS @ 4ohm... but i hear they're stupidily under rated. How much underrated? The focal is 400 Watts RMS.
What i'm looking for in sound? Well i'm not looking to rattle the neighborhood, i want a tight amp that kicks hard and quick. Both of these amps have a high Dampening Factor. Focal >500 and Zapco >900.
Any comments are greatly appreciated... let the battle begin!

thanks
Yeah, my choice would also depend on what sub would be used. If i understood your first post right, it would be a single 12" that has an RMS rating of 600 right? Based on that, I would initially have to say that both amps here don't have enough juice for that kind of sub to reach its full potential. I would look at a sub that did at least 600 watts RMS but ideally more like 800 so you have more headroom.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
mittal
General Discussion
6
Feb 8, 2005 09:45 AM



