General SQ General discussion of Sound Quality related issues.

Gotta ask the pros.... MTX or Clarion amp?

Old Apr 14, 2005 | 08:46 PM
  #1  
Kwalsh24's Avatar
Thread Starter
50 Watt CAFz'r
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 375
Post

Ok I have been looking around for a while now and I have come up with 2 amps that are in my pricerange that are forsale but I dont know what amp is best (overall) Here they are

1) Clarion APX401.4 - $170
(http://www.clarion-eu.com/uk/iPod_co...6918810.4.html)

2) MTX Thunder 304 - ~ $160
(http://www.mtxaudio.com/caraudio/archive/thunder304.cfm)

What do you guys is the best for the $$$? Im just using the amp to run my main car speakers. I just dont know what amp is better overall

Thanks!

[ April 14, 2005, 10:19 PM: Message edited by: Kwalsh24 ]
Old Apr 14, 2005 | 09:05 PM
  #2  
JohnnyToronto's Avatar
1000 Watt CAFz'r
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,856
Post

I used to own one of the older MTX Thunder 4 channel amps. It was awesome, sounded good, made good power, and never had any problems with it. I wouldn't hesitate to use another MTX amp, or reccomend it.
That would be my choice.
Old Apr 15, 2005 | 09:36 AM
  #4  
2 8's AKA Jeepbeats's Avatar
4000 Watt CAFz'r
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 5,644
Post

I have used the APX401.2 and also the Thunder 302, 250D, etc. I like both of them, I would guess that the MTX does closer to 60-70 x 4, as that 37.5 watt figure is at 12.5 volts, and MTX like to underrate. Either will be a good choice, I would imagine.
Old Apr 15, 2005 | 03:28 PM
  #5  
MitekCAKyle's Avatar
50 Watt CAFz'r
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 150
Post

Originally posted by Dave_MacKinnon:
The Clarion APX amps were designed by Robert Zeff - he did Zapco, and currently does Arc Audio amongst others. I have the previous years model (same circuit board) installed on my test bench, and I really like it.

MTX makes an excellent amp as well

The MTX is 4 x 37.5W and the Clarion is 4 x 50W - I'd go for the extra power...
I am biased so I wont comment. That MTX amp was rated at 12.5V so the 37.5 watts isnt a fair comparison to the Clarion. Clarion rated power is at 14.4 Volts. So in this case MTX has more power. MTX is always under rated as well.
Old Apr 18, 2005 | 07:29 AM
  #8  
veeman's Avatar
2000 Watt CAFz'r
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 2,455
Post

both are good brands that I've owned over the years with no problems and i too would not hesitate to buy either if they suited my needs. I supose cosmetics and size etc... would probably be the deciding factor if the price and power were equivalent.
Old Apr 18, 2005 | 07:36 AM
  #9  
Ex-Maxx's Avatar
50 Watt CAFz'r
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 200
Post

Originally posted by DWVW:
MY MXA6004 is CEA rated at 75X4, the birth sheet says 723 watts rms all channels at 2 ohms. So at 4 ohms that's approximately 90 watts a channel which is about 20% more than spec.
I can vouch for that amp...

Originally I was going to use the MXA6004 in combination with another sub amp, but I may not have to... I can't believe how well it drives my B15; I was totally floored. This is in a sealed box, BTW.
Old Apr 18, 2005 | 04:52 PM
  #10  
Thrill_House's Avatar
50 Watt CAFz'r
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 405
Post

Originally posted by Dave_MacKinnon:
Thinking about it, Kyle is right, I should have remembered that MTX under-rates their amps... Totally my bad...

Both are solid amps, both likely make roughly 50W per channel at 4 Ohms.
MTX doesnt underate all there amps, and heavily underates very few of them. I own a Thunder 225 H.O. and a pair Thunder 275's and to my knowledge those amps along with the rest of their "Thunder" series counterparts were the last of my MTX's line of heavily underated "cheater amps".

[ April 18, 2005, 05:53 PM: Message edited by: Thrill_House ]

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:34 AM.