General SQ General discussion of Sound Quality related issues.

Has anyone has used a small bandbass

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-17-2006, 07:58 PM
  #11  
50 Watt CAFz'r
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
Trojan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 233
Reason; so my wife can't damage her subwoofer no matter what she does back there.
Reason two; my wife can't stand it when I pull up to the driveway and she can hear my hatch rattling like hell.
Trojan is offline  
Old 03-19-2006, 10:26 PM
  #12  
500 Watt CAFz'r
 
hofulstrof's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 779
Originally Posted by Trojan
Reason; so my wife can't damage her subwoofer no matter what she does back there.
Reason two; my wife can't stand it when I pull up to the driveway and she can hear my hatch rattling like hell.
why not just get a grill. i went to a local shop and got a nice black metal one for $10. saved me a few times already.

i can understand the rattiling part.it do you have any sound dampeing material back there?
hofulstrof is offline  
Old 03-19-2006, 11:41 PM
  #13  
50 Watt CAFz'r
 
xxPunk0Ramaxx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 167
a 4th order bp can be very nice for sq. transient response is typically better than everything but sealed enclosures. it is typical to experience some noise outside of the passband (mostly due to port resonance) but this can often be decreased by use of a low pass filter or a notch filter.

if you are totally set on using a bp but don't want to give up much room, perhaps consider using a second driver in an isobaric design to decrease required enclosure size for a given response.

there is a lot of output capability in bp enclosures and you can net very flat response as well (but not necessarily over as wide of a range as a ported or sealed enclosure). it is a good idea to use a large flared port to minimize port noise as all output comes from the port itself in a 4th order.
xxPunk0Ramaxx is offline  
Old 03-20-2006, 09:33 AM
  #14  
1000 Watt CAFz'r
 
theboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,267
I have 2 AVI SL subs in 6th order boxes,they both sound great and impress me everytime I listen to them.Also they are increadably efficent...150w to the 8" and it rips!
theboy is offline  
Old 03-20-2006, 01:35 PM
  #15  
50 Watt CAFz'r
iTrader: (1)
 
gleepoy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 399
Originally Posted by xxPunk0Ramaxx
a 4th order bp can be very nice for sq. transient response is typically better than everything but sealed enclosures. it is typical to experience some noise outside of the passband (mostly due to port resonance) but this can often be decreased by use of a low pass filter or a notch filter.

if you are totally set on using a bp but don't want to give up much room, perhaps consider using a second driver in an isobaric design to decrease required enclosure size for a given response.

there is a lot of output capability in bp enclosures and you can net very flat response as well (but not necessarily over as wide of a range as a ported or sealed enclosure). it is a good idea to use a large flared port to minimize port noise as all output comes from the port itself in a 4th order.
Good post...good advice.
gleepoy is offline  
Old 03-21-2006, 09:44 PM
  #16  
0 Watt CAFz'r
 
installman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 49
BP designs are typically not for SQ, they have limited response, are very slow and port noise is a huge problem using todays car audio woofers. The problem is the smaller the box, the longer and bigger the port should be. If you're set on a BP I would go with a BP4 design as they're smaller and have better power handling over a wider range than a BP6. Spend some extra time and a little $ and dampen the trunk properly to eliminate rattles and go with a sealed enclosure for the smallest box, best power handling and smoothest curve.
installman is offline  
Old 03-22-2006, 12:37 AM
  #17  
50 Watt CAFz'r
 
xxPunk0Ramaxx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 167
Originally Posted by installman
BP designs are typically not for SQ, they have limited response, are very slow and port noise is a huge problem using todays car audio woofers. The problem is the smaller the box, the longer and bigger the port should be. If you're set on a BP I would go with a BP4 design as they're smaller and have better power handling over a wider range than a BP6. Spend some extra time and a little $ and dampen the trunk properly to eliminate rattles and go with a sealed enclosure for the smallest box, best power handling and smoothest curve.
what do you consider "good" power handling? if a sub can reach full excursion with less power (which would be the case when comparing a BP to a sealed enclosure), i don't see how that is a bad thing.
xxPunk0Ramaxx is offline  
Old 03-22-2006, 07:52 PM
  #18  
0 Watt CAFz'r
 
installman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 49
the problem is because of the design of a BP, you don't hear the upper end distortion so it's much harder to tell when you're overdriving the woofer. Because the front chamber absorbs high frequency you can be pushing the woofer beyond it's limits and not hear it. BP's are good for lower power applications but if you've got the power, why not go for a sealed or vented enclosure

Years ago when enclosure size was huge BP's offered great output for a 8 to 10" woofer with lower power needed. With todays car audio subs why bother? I can put the right 12" sub into a 15 liter enclosure and get incredible low end response with all the attack that a BP doesn't offer. I just don't see the point anymore.

Find me any high end system that uses a BP.


Installman
installman is offline  
Old 03-31-2006, 09:38 PM
  #19  
50 Watt CAFz'r
 
juggernautxtr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 50
the only woofer's i recomend for bp is old school cerwin vega's the motor structures were so damn over built it almost didn't matter in over driving them.

i have had one band pass box in my life and had 2 thump gold subs 700 watts a peice max they worked well driven at 200 watts but sounded like sh*t cause a lot of the lower frequencies were almost inaudible, and this was a recomended encloser for them.

i know these aren't the greatest subs in the world but i built a box for them in a sealed enclosure they sounded 3 times better.
juggernautxtr is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
masterelyt
General Discussion
7
05-06-2012 08:01 AM
fresh1
General Discussion
52
02-04-2010 04:59 PM
sirux
General Discussion
26
01-19-2010 10:58 PM
Lspade69
General SQ
5
01-22-2007 09:09 PM



Quick Reply: Has anyone has used a small bandbass



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:26 PM.