General SQ General discussion of Sound Quality related issues.

I feel like I'm fishing in a swimming pool.....

Old Nov 3, 2004 | 09:41 PM
  #21  
Kool's Avatar
500 Watt CAFz'r
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 662
Post

Originally posted by SUX 2BU:
The parabolic shape is naturally stronger than any other cone shape. Think of the arc that makes up the curve of a parabola.
Damn, you beat me to it lol
Old Nov 4, 2004 | 11:49 AM
  #26  
hobbes26's Avatar
50 Watt CAFz'r
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 146
Post

Originally posted by SUX 2BU:
The parabolic shape is naturally stronger than any other cone shape.
What about compared to exponentially curved cones?
Old Nov 4, 2004 | 11:53 AM
  #28  
hobbes26's Avatar
50 Watt CAFz'r
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 146
Post

Sorry, maybe I should say, higher exponential factors than parabolic...
Old Nov 4, 2004 | 01:01 PM
  #30  
hobbes26's Avatar
50 Watt CAFz'r
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 146
Post

Originally posted by Dave_MacKinnon:
Back to the original question about cone resonances.

Companies who are serious about speaker production take into account three primary criteria when they design a speaker cone - Mass, Rigidity and Damping. They acheive these criteria through combinations of different materials in different shapes to produce the desired result.

Three examples of cone designs that utilise multiple materials to acheive these goals are the Focal W-sandwich on the Utopia and the Kevlar sandwich on the Polykevlar and K2 cones, and the Kicker Tri-Tech cone.
Termination of the cone at the surround (with a softer or stiffer surround) can also have a huge effect on the cone resonances.

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:48 AM.