Mmmmmm...my new babies.

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

Search this Thread

Jan 16, 2005 | 10:45 AM

#21

Paul Niwranski

Guest

Posts: n/a

Quote:

Originally posted by Brandon:
Awesome shape, I know they weren't abused and I got them for a good price....what more could you want?

You said they were reconed. Aside from bending the frame how else could they be abused??

Jan 16, 2005 | 04:46 PM

#22

Brandon

Thread Starter

4000 Watt CAFz'r

iTrader: (1)

Joined: Jan 2001

Posts: 4,603

Quote:

Originally posted by Dukk:
<blockquote>quote:<hr />Originally posted by Brandon:
Awesome shape, I know they weren't abused and I got them for a good price....what more could you want?

You said they were reconed. Aside from bending the frame how else could they be abused?? [/QUOTE]they were reconed because they were old.

They could have been abused by feeding unclean signal. I dunno, that's all I could think of.

Jan 16, 2005 | 04:50 PM

#23

Brandon

Thread Starter

4000 Watt CAFz'r

iTrader: (1)

Joined: Jan 2001

Posts: 4,603

Quote:

Originally posted by Kilowatt:
<blockquote>quote:<hr />Originally posted by Brandon:

There mint, new recones, and even though I've only got 400(or so) WRMS going to them....I estimate them to be hitting easy 145's in 1.5Cuft each.

[img]tongue.gif[/img] [img]graemlins/bs.gif[/img] [/QUOTE]Yea I was a bit off, but that's cool, 137.5 is still a pretty respectable number considering.

They hit 146's on a constant basis in Brad's truck with the Kicker ZR 1000 in the same size box though.....pretty impressive for subs that were built in what...96?