General SQ General discussion of Sound Quality related issues.

Phase

Old Sep 21, 2004 | 10:47 AM
  #11  
TomK's Avatar
1000 Watt CAFz'r
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 1,649
Post

Tuning for hi-end is a nitemare. Everytime you touch anything, you have to go back and pretty much redo/check everything else. Change your x-over, and it screws your time alignment, etc, etc, etc. It's nutz. You basically have to tune everything, make an adjustment, retune everything, make an adjustment and so on about a billion times............ assuming you want to be perfectly high-end like Defro

New 900 will soon have a slot where you pop in a quarter and out pops bacon and eggs with a side sausage. [img]graemlins/bow.gif[/img]
Old Sep 21, 2004 | 10:53 AM
  #12  
PEI330Ci's Avatar
Thread Starter
1000 Watt CAFz'r
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,783
Post

^^^^now that's what I'm talking about!!!!!

Will there be a firmware update for lunch?
Old Sep 21, 2004 | 03:46 PM
  #15  
Mr. Marco's Avatar
1000 Watt CAFz'r
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 1,221
Post

Defro, have you been treated with Alpine F#1 Gene therapy?
Old Sep 21, 2004 | 04:57 PM
  #18  
JohnVroom's Avatar
Yankee
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 3,599
Post

First, ALL drivers do NOT have uniform phase response. That is, they don't reproduce all frequecies in absolute phase. What tends to happen, is that there is increasing delay in phase response as frequency increases. For example, a midrange may reproduce a 300hz tone with a 30 degree "lag" versus the input signal, and 180 degree "lag" when reproducing a 1khz signal. Think of it as a big downhill slope where the driver is further out of phase (with relation to input signal) as freqency increases.

Well it's going to get worse. You see, using 2 drivers with overlapping frequency response also means they have overlapping phase response. This wouldn't be too bad if the energy recieved by the ear did not include near field reflections. Without near field reflections, what your ears would hear would be a summed phase response, with timing cues
So from this prospective a driver that can cover the bulk of the audio spectrum is better and a steep crossover slope (Joseph Audio) is a good idea.

I think this is why people like (some) horns and planar drivers. The work a fairly large freq. band and the critical point for both is the crossover region.

I have heard good sounding speakers with steep slopes (Joseph Audios predecessor) but I usually prefer a gentle crossover slope. Funny how actives always tend to be 18db/octave or steeper

I try to set up my car system to be a near field listening experience, with direct sound and minimal reflection from the drivers.
Old Sep 21, 2004 | 05:00 PM
  #19  
JohnVroom's Avatar
Yankee
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 3,599
Post

Seriously does ANYONE dislike the sound of planers or for that matter ribbons? (I didn’t like Sound Labs a few years ago too rolled off in the HF). As a genre I think their only real shortcoming is, of course, bass and ultimate volume
Old Sep 21, 2004 | 05:09 PM
  #20  
PEI330Ci's Avatar
Thread Starter
1000 Watt CAFz'r
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,783
Post

WTF!!!!!!

I thought this was about PHASE!!

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:04 AM.