General SQ General discussion of Sound Quality related issues.
View Poll Results: WHICH DO YOU PREFER?
SYSTEMS WITH REAR FILL SPEAKERS.
34
39.08%
SYSTEMS WITH FRONT ONLY SPEAKERS.
22
25.29%
SYSTEMS WITH REAR ONLY SPEAKERS.
0
0%
BOTH DEPENDING ON VEH AND GOALS.
18
20.69%
DON'T CARE AS LONG AS IT SOUNDS GOOD.
13
14.94%
Voters: 87. You may not vote on this poll

Rear fill or no Rear fill?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 7, 2009 | 02:29 PM
  #31  
maltesechicken's Avatar
2000 Watt CAFz'r
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 2,026
They are 6.5. I was watching them when I had my music "cranked." While they weren't distorting, the amount of travel I saw coming from them made me think they were reaching their mechanical limits. I don't know how much power they were actually seeing at that point, and I'm afraid of over doing it . . . also, do mids have a break in period like subs? If so, I think I'll break them in a bit more before lowering the x-over.

Since I'm using the same model amp for my sub and highs, it's easy to set the crossovers to match.

I have some tuning to do on my stereo ie - bigger sub box & higher tuning freq. for one, sound deadening the doors for 2 and then properly setting my X-overs and gains.
Old Mar 14, 2009 | 10:10 AM
  #32  
doublexl's Avatar
50 Watt CAFz'r
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 228
i voted front speakers only cuz thats what i rock.

when you run damn near 1000rms on a front stage.....who needs a rear?
Old Mar 14, 2009 | 11:01 AM
  #33  
maltesechicken's Avatar
2000 Watt CAFz'r
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 2,026
Originally Posted by doublexl
i voted front speakers only cuz thats what i rock.

when you run damn near 1000rms on a front stage.....who needs a rear?
That's just nuts . . . I have 400rms on my fronts, and I can't even tolerate it at full power . . . where did you get components that can handle that much?
Old Mar 14, 2009 | 11:10 AM
  #34  
doublexl's Avatar
50 Watt CAFz'r
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 228
Originally Posted by maltesechicken
That's just nuts . . . I have 400rms on my fronts, and I can't even tolerate it at full power . . . where did you get components that can handle that much?
well its split between 8 speakers.....2 tweeters, 2 mid-range, 2 mid-bass, 2 small subs

the "rated" power would be 750rms, but......jl amps usually put down more then they lead on.
Old Mar 14, 2009 | 09:11 PM
  #35  
BigRedGuy's Avatar
2000 Watt CAFz'r
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 2,383
Talking

Originally Posted by doublexl
well its split between 8 speakers.....2 tweeters, 2 mid-range, 2 mid-bass, 2 small subs

the "rated" power would be 750rms, but......jl amps usually put down more then they lead on.
Nice setup dude....I thought I was about dividing up the signal to very specific drivers....
Old Mar 14, 2009 | 10:06 PM
  #36  
doublexl's Avatar
50 Watt CAFz'r
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 228
Originally Posted by BigRedGuy
Nice setup dude....I thought I was about dividing up the signal to very specific drivers....
i'm running a 4 way active crossover. so i have to have alot of amp channels.
Old Mar 15, 2009 | 05:32 PM
  #37  
maltesechicken's Avatar
2000 Watt CAFz'r
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 2,026
Just checked your sig.
So then you have a little more than 75WRMS for each tweeter, midrange and midbass, and 150wrms for the subs then?

In that regard, 750WRMS isn't a crazy amount of power at all for your front stage . . . and with everything fully active, I imagine that it sounds very pretty too!
Old Mar 15, 2009 | 06:14 PM
  #38  
goalie 35's Avatar
Goalie Man
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 1,412
well the way i look at it, i pay for the gas,insurance and always sit in front............. so thats were the best sound will be. also every rock concert i have been to has front speakers only, no rear speakers........but if you plan on having people in the back seat or listen to videos, then rear speakers are the way to go as there is information recorded for those channals..where as most music has no rear music in the recording, what you hear is the decks ability to split the sound into those channals. but its not true rear music....
Old Mar 15, 2009 | 06:30 PM
  #39  
danyman's Avatar
1000 Watt CAFz'r
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,978
lmao its like watching an old movie cassette tape, mono or stereo sound recording. plug that to todays surround sounds and all it does is split the mono or stereo into multi channels 5.1 7.1 10.1 12.1 whatever you have. and thats what our decks are doing. making a stereo sound ( 2 channel ) and making a split to 4 speakers.

best way to say this is if your speakers suck ***** go rear fill. if you have a good set of comp. up front you should have no need for rear fill
Old Mar 15, 2009 | 06:46 PM
  #40  
doublexl's Avatar
50 Watt CAFz'r
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 228
Originally Posted by maltesechicken
Just checked your sig.So then you have a little more than 75WRMS for each tweeter, midrange and midbass, and 150wrms for the subs then?

In that regard, 750WRMS isn't a crazy amount of power at all for your front stage . . . and with everything fully active, I imagine that it sounds very pretty too!
Yes. Although the mid-range is only rated for 50rms they have lived for the last year and a half on +90rms. It's a lovely little 3" mid that happily runs down to its 12db hpf slope at 200hz. I'm thinking of bumping it up to a HD 600/4......150rms rated.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:30 AM.