Install related Need a car audio install related question answered? Have a tip you want to share, post in here!

which amp is better?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-01-2005, 06:24 PM
  #11  
500 Watt CAFz'r
iTrader: (4)
 
92zed34's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 813
Post

[img]graemlins/offtopic1.gif[/img] Maybe we should just arrange a meeting place out in left field? [img]graemlins/dunno.gif[/img] \

If it has to be one of the three go for the pioneer [img]graemlins/thumb.gif[/img]
92zed34 is offline  
Old 04-01-2005, 07:10 PM
  #12  
500 Watt CAFz'r
iTrader: (1)
 
loudtdi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 628
Post

Haunz,

There are many Rockford amps in service and new on retailers shelves that have efficiency in the 65%/66%/67% range and they are most certainly class AB topology.

[ April 01, 2005, 08:31 PM: Message edited by: loudtdi ]
loudtdi is offline  
Old 04-01-2005, 07:30 PM
  #13  
1000 Watt CAFz'r
 
pinhead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Posts: 1,770
Post

i don't think the efficiency and heatsink efficeny are the same thing
efficiency has more to do with biasing and powersupply and output design
pinhead is offline  
Old 04-01-2005, 07:37 PM
  #14  
500 Watt CAFz'r
iTrader: (1)
 
loudtdi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 628
Post

Efficiency is quite simple to understand.....

An amplifier that is 60% efficient turns 60% of the current it draws into wattage, the other 40% into heat.

Heat-sink efficiency would be the rate at which the heat-sink is capable of dissipating heat. When talking about heat-sink efficiency, constant dissipation and surge capability are often noted.
loudtdi is offline  
Old 04-01-2005, 10:19 PM
  #15  
0 Watt CAFz'r
Thread Starter
 
dtwizzyd12's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 25
Post

how does all this help me, hehe [img]smile.gif[/img]
I cause such a stir, lol

so Pioneer GM-D510M would work great with the 2 subs
dtwizzyd12 is offline  
Old 04-01-2005, 10:59 PM
  #16  
0 Watt CAFz'r
Thread Starter
 
dtwizzyd12's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 25
Post

how would you rate this amp? i hope i can get it tho [img]smile.gif[/img] i know this is the best choice, but how much should i pay for it!

Kenwood kac-x401m
Maximum Output Power: 1200 Watts x 1

Power Output at 2 Ohms, at 12V (1kHz, 0.5% THD): 400 Watts x 1

Power Output at 2 Ohms, at 14.4V (1kHz, 0.5% THD): 600 Watts x 1

Power Output at 4 Ohms, at 12V (20Hz-20kHz, 0.05% THD): 200 Watts x 1

Power Output at 4 Ohms, at 14.4V (20Hz-20kHz, 0.05% THD): 300 Watts x 1

2 ohm stable
how do i set to 12V or 14.4V? because if I want to get the best out of this amp, then i should go with 2 Ohms, at 14.4V (1kHz, 0.5% THD): 600 Watts x 1, right?
dtwizzyd12 is offline  
Old 04-02-2005, 02:39 PM
  #18  
2000 Watt CAFz'r
 
maltesechicken's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 2,026
Post

dtwizzyd12

That last amp (Kenwood 401M) will give each of your subs 300 wrms. Just what you are looking for (more power is better than less).

Ignore the above debate about efficiency . . . it doesn't answer your question and it is in left field. Thanks Haunz [img]graemlins/thumb.gif[/img]

Don't look at 2 channel amps. Look at Mono amps.
What are you reasons for only looking at Kenwood and Pioneer?
maltesechicken is offline  
Old 04-02-2005, 04:10 PM
  #19  
0 Watt CAFz'r
Thread Starter
 
dtwizzyd12's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 25
Post

thanks for the help maltesechicken [img]smile.gif[/img]
i hope i can get this amp, i might end up paying $200-250 for it which is relatively cheap, considering it sells for $400 US

the reason i look for pioneer/kenwood and such is because they are cheap (brand name, but cheap),other than the amp, everything else i'll have is higher end (infinity: subs, 6.5 components, 6x9 3ways...) its all infinity in my car
dtwizzyd12 is offline  
Old 04-03-2005, 10:55 AM
  #20  
4000 Watt CAFz'r
iTrader: (3)
 
Haunz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 4,218
Post

Originally posted by maltesechicken:
Ignore the above debate about efficiency . . . it doesn't answer your question and it is in left field. Thanks Haunz [img]graemlins/thumb.gif[/img]
I disagree.. you should most definatly considering effeciency when looking for an amp... [img]graemlins/freak.gif[/img]

As far as how effecient RFs amps really are.. Iam still not buying.. I think you guys should pay less attention to marketing fluff...

I'll see if I can find some diffinitive info, but as I recall reading (more then once) the theoretical maximum for an AB class amp is %78 at complete saturation, and %66 just below saturation...

In practice most AB amps are well below %50 running typical program material.. [img]graemlins/thumb.gif[/img]
Haunz is offline  


Quick Reply: which amp is better?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:05 AM.