320 Bit rate compared to CD

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

Search this Thread

Jun 20, 2011 | 07:44 PM

#11

wasted911

Moderator

iTrader: (2)

Joined: Nov 2005

Posts: 1,285

Quote:

Originally Posted by BradSk88

It really depends on who recorded it. Obviously you'll hear a lot more detail if you're listening to audiophile tracks, but if you're listening to rap, pop or rock you likely won't hear it unless the audio engineer really cared.

one man..

Dr Dre

Jun 20, 2011 | 08:58 PM

#12

link2009

0 Watt CAFz'r

Joined: May 2010

Posts: 22

Quote:

Originally Posted by BradSk88

I agree with this but don't single out certain genres. Like waste911 said, Dr. Dre really cared about production and he really put his heart into his music.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Diskro

Theres not much difference in sound quality

It doesn't matter whether or not you edited your post. Luckily I subscribed to this thread and got your message before you actually thought about what you were typing.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Diskro

320 bit is a million times better than mp3, it's less compressed

Seriously? MP3 is a CODEC, 320 Bit rate refers to the amount of data contained in an MP3 file. Don't get into conversations that you don't understand.

Jun 20, 2011 | 09:41 PM

#13

danyman

1000 Watt CAFz'r

iTrader: (1)

Joined: Aug 2007

Posts: 1,978

i hear the difference. and all my cds are in 320 for convenience sakes. but i still use the cds. mp3 sounds harsh

SUPPORT THE CD INDUSTRY lol... not to many stores left.. god dam internet