Off-topic Chat For everything unrelated to car audio. Jokes, stories, videos etc within.

Digicam's ?

Old Dec 25, 2003 | 02:29 PM
  #2  
goofball2k's Avatar
500 Watt CAFz'r
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 536
Post

Minolta's are good camera's, definitely not lower end stuff like Vivitar or the like.

Spend some time with it, it might just take a bit of familiarity with it before the pictures start coming out better.

Personally, I would just get a card reader instead of plugging the camera in all the time. You don't need all the software they give you, only if you want to edit your pictures or what not.
Old Dec 29, 2003 | 01:23 PM
  #4  
CaptDeth's Avatar
500 Watt CAFz'r
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 909
Post

Only problem that seems to be common with the minolta is it tends to eat batteries EXTREMELY fast. Other than that it seems to take great picks and have all the right features.
Old Dec 29, 2003 | 06:05 PM
  #5  
ChizzerZ24's Avatar
2000 Watt CAFz'r
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 2,417
Post

Originally posted by goofball2k:
Minolta's are good camera's, definitely not lower end stuff like Vivitar or the like.

Spend some time with it, it might just take a bit of familiarity with it before the pictures start coming out better.

Personally, I would just get a card reader instead of plugging the camera in all the time. You don't need all the software they give you, only if you want to edit your pictures or what not.
If your using Windows Xp you don't need the software, xp will just use Scanners and cameras and you can delete the image automatically after the image is uploaded to the pc, I got a new Kodak dx6490 and took there bs software off... nice and simple the way it should be
Old Dec 29, 2003 | 06:07 PM
  #6  
ChizzerZ24's Avatar
2000 Watt CAFz'r
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 2,417
Post

Originally posted by CaptDeth:
Only problem that seems to be common with the minolta is it tends to eat batteries EXTREMELY fast. Other than that it seems to take great picks and have all the right features.
It's more so a common issue with all cameras, look into the rechargabel NIMH batteries they seem to last abit, I am using a Lith-ion battery pack and I get 2 hours with using the lcd screen for pics... which is pretty damn nice considering most last 1 hour if your lucky
Old Dec 29, 2003 | 07:24 PM
  #7  
ChrisB's Avatar
Guest
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 7,724
Post

Originally posted by ChizzerZ24:
</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by CaptDeth:
Only problem that seems to be common with the minolta is it tends to eat batteries EXTREMELY fast. Other than that it seems to take great picks and have all the right features.
It's more so a common issue with all cameras, look into the rechargabel NIMH batteries they seem to last abit, I am using a Lith-ion battery pack and I get 2 hours with using the lcd screen for pics... which is pretty damn nice considering most last 1 hour if your lucky </font>[/QUOTE]yep.. but the Minolta's seem to be much worse on batteries than most other digital camera's.. although they do take very nice pictures!
Old Dec 30, 2003 | 10:35 AM
  #9  
ChizzerZ24's Avatar
2000 Watt CAFz'r
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 2,417
Post

Originally posted by Dave_MacKinnon:
I used to carry 5 sets of batteries for my Nikon. With the Canon, the pair of Lithium batteries is good for about a thousand shots, but I need a couple sets of batteries for the external flash.. The cost of doing business I suppose..
How long do the batteries last when using external flash? Lookin at getting one for my Digi Cam as well, but if it's gonna eat batteries like mad then forget it... how many pics would u say you get outta the camera with the external flash?
Old Dec 31, 2003 | 03:53 PM
  #10  
Bigmike216's Avatar
1000 Watt CAFz'r
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,649
Post

an external flash will usually use it's own batteries..

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:48 AM.