Off-topic Chat For everything unrelated to car audio. Jokes, stories, videos etc within.

WHA to knock out NHL?

Old Sep 11, 2004 | 04:36 PM
  #11  
Blinddemonz's Avatar
Thread Starter
4000 Watt CAFz'r
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 4,655
Post

Originally posted by JordyO:
</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by Jmac:
It's not a strike ... it's a lock-out ...

Strike = Players refuse to play
Lock-out = Owners refuse to let players play
Exactly... there's a HUGE difference.

It's not "almost" like a strike because the players would go back to play under the same rules if they were allowed to.

Meaning the owners hold all the cards in terms of whether or not they go back to play. So, like I said, if it becomes too big of a problem they'll just accept the best offer they can get and then get back to the way things were.
</font>[/QUOTE]So it has nothing to do with the players?? What exactly is goin on then, im confused now
Old Sep 11, 2004 | 07:57 PM
  #12  
Jmac's Avatar
500 Watt CAFz'r
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 575
Post

The owner's want a salary cap and salary limits so the players get less money ...

Of course, all this was caused by the owners themselves by giving out outrageous salaries and now they're whining and complaining about not making enough money ...
Old Sep 11, 2004 | 08:34 PM
  #13  
MrEastSide's Avatar
2000 Watt CAFz'r
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 2,142
Post

Originally posted by JordyO:
The WHA will never take over the NHL. It just wouldn't happen.
Old Sep 11, 2004 | 10:43 PM
  #14  
Blinddemonz's Avatar
Thread Starter
4000 Watt CAFz'r
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 4,655
Post

Originally posted by Jmac:
The owner's want a salary cap and salary limits so the players get less money ...

Of course, all this was caused by the owners themselves by giving out outrageous salaries and now they're whining and complaining about not making enough money ...
so really who wants moer money thats causing this lock out???
Old Sep 12, 2004 | 05:52 AM
  #15  
ZachCHartwell's Avatar
4000 Watt CAFz'r
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 5,498
Post

both parties are just as guilty imo.
Old Sep 12, 2004 | 06:44 AM
  #16  
CasinoGreek's Avatar
50 Watt CAFz'r
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 302
Post

yea owners want more money and so do the players......the owners want a system thats more like the NFL which is i guess the best system out there..
Old Sep 12, 2004 | 10:09 AM
  #17  
Father Yuli's Avatar
Level 3 Supporter
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 11,604
Post

wtf is WHA?
Old Sep 12, 2004 | 10:18 AM
  #18  
ChizzerZ24's Avatar
2000 Watt CAFz'r
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 2,417
Post

World Hockey Assosiation .. .I think...
Old Sep 12, 2004 | 12:09 PM
  #19  
Blinddemonz's Avatar
Thread Starter
4000 Watt CAFz'r
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 4,655
Post

Originally posted by ChizzerZ24:
World Hockey Assosiation .. .I think...
That is right, Yuli i said the same thing when someone mentioned it to me I thought it was Western Hockey buttttttt thats WHL lol
Old Sep 12, 2004 | 02:12 PM
  #20  
JordyO's Avatar
4000 Watt CAFz'r
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 6,363
Post

Originally posted by Z24:
</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by JordyO:
</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by Jmac:
It's not a strike ... it's a lock-out ...

Strike = Players refuse to play
Lock-out = Owners refuse to let players play
Exactly... there's a HUGE difference.

It's not "almost" like a strike because the players would go back to play under the same rules if they were allowed to.

Meaning the owners hold all the cards in terms of whether or not they go back to play. So, like I said, if it becomes too big of a problem they'll just accept the best offer they can get and then get back to the way things were.
</font>[/QUOTE]So it has nothing to do with the players?? What exactly is goin on then, im confused now
</font>[/QUOTE]Basically.. no, it doesn't really have anything to do with the players. The would keep on playing with the rules the same way they are now if they could.

The problem is that the owners have over payed for too many players and now they need/want a way to bring it back under control.

So they're trying to put some sort of salary restrictions in place (not necessarily a cap from what I've heard)

The players want no part of it because it would restrict their salaries. They just want things left the way they are.

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:06 PM.