What is wrong with Americans??????
Guest
Posts: n/a
dukk, i dont belive that iraq is innocent of international terrorism. yuli if you dont think that saddam is a bad guy and was the leader of a huge army of militats that would live and die by his every word, your nuts, i think thousands of kurds would tell a different story. wars cost money, and in war people die, do you think that the bush sent soldiers over there and thought they were all coming back, one of the key ingredients of war is death, its what fuels it, that and usually money, perhaps my wish that terrorisits thinking twice before the next 9/11 is crazy, and likley is, but i guess i just hope that i never have to see anything like that again in my lifetime. who polices the police, and who would police the police policing the police, which came first the chicken or the egg, i dunno. yuli, what do you think would have been reasonable retailiation for 9/11, birthday cakes and bunny rabbits, my only complaints are that they didnt invade earlier, more bombs werent dropped, and that saddam and osama and all their terrorist bum buddies are still breathing. do i like bush as the leader of the biggest superpower in the world, not particularily, am i happy that a trigger happy texan was the president when 9\11 happened, your damn right. do i care if he plunges his nation into poverty fighting a war that can have no winner, not if it benefits mine
2000 Watt CAFz'r
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 2,026
Originally posted by Hardcore Rock Superstar:
I woulda voted for kerry, solely cause he spoke about hockey in one of his speeches and seemed pretty passionate about it.
Apart from that who cares?
I woulda voted for kerry, solely cause he spoke about hockey in one of his speeches and seemed pretty passionate about it.
Apart from that who cares?
Just to Echo a few points:
Canadians are just as stupid - we voted the lying, stealing Liberals in again.
Bush is better for Exports.
Kerry has more waffles than a house of pancakes. He said he supported Bush's decision to go into Iraq.
Latter he said that he would not go into Iraq.
Where ever popular opinion is Kerry is there too. He was trying to win on as the country's "yes man"
FurleyII - Agreed! Our country is morally bankrupt (But USA isn't far behind).
[ November 04, 2004, 08:26 AM: Message edited by: maltesechicken ]
2000 Watt CAFz'r
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 2,026
I find it interesting that Bush took on Iraq and the evil that is going on there.
If you want to talk about the need for international policing, why isn't anything being done in Bosnia and many other suffering countries?
Nothing is being done there because US invasion wouldn't help the US at all. When is comes the international idea of "to serve and protect" the phrase "our best interests" needs to be added. All of North America is simply looking out for their own interests.
If you want to talk about the need for international policing, why isn't anything being done in Bosnia and many other suffering countries?
Nothing is being done there because US invasion wouldn't help the US at all. When is comes the international idea of "to serve and protect" the phrase "our best interests" needs to be added. All of North America is simply looking out for their own interests.
Guest
Posts: n/a
Originally posted by CasinoGreek:
God help us all.
God help us all.
At least Americans are allowed to express themselves in their faith without some wackjob minority group freaking out.
Bush knew that there was nothing in Iraq, they knew 100% that he had no weapons. Saddam had NOTHING to do with Bin Laden yet they got ROCKED by the US Army. Sure Saddam was a bad guy but dont go leveling the whole country trying to get the guy and pretend to look for some weapons of mass destruction. This is NO different from WW2 when even after Hitler killed himself Stalin still went on to destroy the entire Germany just b/c they had tons of ammo left over.
Hey Bush knows N.Korea has weapons yet he wont attack them, and u know why b/c Korea said 'Yah we got the shiit and we aint scared to use it' so obvioiusly Bush wont do anything. With Saddam they knew he had Nothing so they invaded him like a helpless school girl.
So let see, No weapons of mass destruction, millions of iraqi's dead, over 1000 US Soldiers are dead, American economy is in deficit, Iraq is destroyed and being robbed of oil BUT in the mean time Osama is still free and no one has any clue as to where he is, he spends his free time making short feature films that look like he's running a presidential campaign to be the next US president. I'd say the whole war on terror thing had gone SLIGHTLY off track with Bush, we are not even trying to catch any terrorists any more, we are more preoccupied with stealing oil from iraq and keep opressin it's people who are now ALL labeled as terrirsts b/c they just wont bend over and take in the rear from Bush.
Hey Bush knows N.Korea has weapons yet he wont attack them, and u know why b/c Korea said 'Yah we got the shiit and we aint scared to use it' so obvioiusly Bush wont do anything. With Saddam they knew he had Nothing so they invaded him like a helpless school girl.
So let see, No weapons of mass destruction, millions of iraqi's dead, over 1000 US Soldiers are dead, American economy is in deficit, Iraq is destroyed and being robbed of oil BUT in the mean time Osama is still free and no one has any clue as to where he is, he spends his free time making short feature films that look like he's running a presidential campaign to be the next US president. I'd say the whole war on terror thing had gone SLIGHTLY off track with Bush, we are not even trying to catch any terrorists any more, we are more preoccupied with stealing oil from iraq and keep opressin it's people who are now ALL labeled as terrirsts b/c they just wont bend over and take in the rear from Bush.
so when u think about it there really is no winner in this war in iraq, there are only victimes who happen to be US troops, their families and a whooooooooole bunch of dead iraqis.
oh and btw, Saddam wasnt the only one to kill Kurds for whatever reason. He was the only one to admit it. and if u dont know the reason for fighting between the iraqi national guard and Kurdish guarilla fighters was a civil war initiated by Kurds. Alghought i strongly dissagree with some of the techniques saddam used on kurds but as u say a war is a war. What was happening between Saddam and Kurds is not ANY different from what is goin on in Chechnia right now, except russian military doesnt use toxic weapons.
oh and btw, Saddam wasnt the only one to kill Kurds for whatever reason. He was the only one to admit it. and if u dont know the reason for fighting between the iraqi national guard and Kurdish guarilla fighters was a civil war initiated by Kurds. Alghought i strongly dissagree with some of the techniques saddam used on kurds but as u say a war is a war. What was happening between Saddam and Kurds is not ANY different from what is goin on in Chechnia right now, except russian military doesnt use toxic weapons.
Guest
Posts: n/a
Originally posted by Father Yuli:
so when u think about it there really is no winner in this war in iraq, there are only victimes who happen to be US troops, their families and a whooooooooole bunch of dead iraqis.
oh and btw, Saddam wasnt the only one to kill Kurds for whatever reason. He was the only one to admit it. and if u dont know the reason for fighting between the iraqi national guard and Kurdish guarilla fighters was a civil war initiated by Kurds. Alghought i strongly dissagree with some of the techniques saddam used on kurds but as u say a war is a war. What was happening between Saddam and Kurds is not ANY different from what is goin on in Chechnia right now, except russian military doesnt use toxic weapons.
so when u think about it there really is no winner in this war in iraq, there are only victimes who happen to be US troops, their families and a whooooooooole bunch of dead iraqis.
oh and btw, Saddam wasnt the only one to kill Kurds for whatever reason. He was the only one to admit it. and if u dont know the reason for fighting between the iraqi national guard and Kurdish guarilla fighters was a civil war initiated by Kurds. Alghought i strongly dissagree with some of the techniques saddam used on kurds but as u say a war is a war. What was happening between Saddam and Kurds is not ANY different from what is goin on in Chechnia right now, except russian military doesnt use toxic weapons.
yep, pretty much.
the reason desert storm only stayed in the desert was, as the first Bush put it himself, "We had no viable exit strategy", thus they didnt enter and destroy any major cities. I call this good planing when you have no plan. lol
But this Bush was gonna outsmart his dad and just go in and start killing shiit. Apperantly he had no viable exit stragety either.
I wish Clinton was still the president.
the reason desert storm only stayed in the desert was, as the first Bush put it himself, "We had no viable exit strategy", thus they didnt enter and destroy any major cities. I call this good planing when you have no plan. lol
But this Bush was gonna outsmart his dad and just go in and start killing shiit. Apperantly he had no viable exit stragety either.
I wish Clinton was still the president.
50 Watt CAFz'r
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 422
Originally posted by maltesechicken:
</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by Hardcore Rock Superstar:
I woulda voted for kerry, solely cause he spoke about hockey in one of his speeches and seemed pretty passionate about it.
Apart from that who cares?
</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by Hardcore Rock Superstar:
I woulda voted for kerry, solely cause he spoke about hockey in one of his speeches and seemed pretty passionate about it.
Apart from that who cares?
Just to Echo a few points:
Canadians are just as stupid - we voted the lying, stealing Liberals in again.
Bush is better for Exports.
Kerry has more waffles than a house of pancakes. He said he supported Bush's decision to go into Iraq.
Latter he said that he would not go into Iraq.
Where ever popular opinion is Kerry is there too. He was trying to win on as the country's "yes man"
FurleyII - Agreed! Our country is morally bankrupt (But USA isn't far behind). </font>[/QUOTE]I voted for the liberals because there wasn't a good alternative, more less the devil we know and the other parties spoke to me less then the liberals
