no no i think he means the military fired a missile at one of the hijacked planes to stop it from hitting the second tower and missed, not the terrorists firing missiles, i wouldnt mind seeing the "unreleased tapes" but at the same time, this is also a government that swore up and down about WMDs and the threat saddam posed etc etc etc.... so that bush and all his buddies could get richer off of recontruction contracts and the sale of military arms.... who was it got the first and biggest recontruction contract in iraq? ooooooh riiiiight haliburton... wonder what kinda kickback GW got from his buddy for that lil deal?

 

Well if that clip thinks a missile hit it, who shot the missile?

And isn't the US's missiles like heat detected or radar or some crap like that?

That is very interesting!

I don't think a 747 hit it.

 

oohhhh ok makes sense now lol [img]graemlins/thumb.gif[/img] thanx

 

[QUOTE]Originally posted by Tha-Game:
so that bush and all his buddies could get richer off of recontruction contracts and the sale of military arms.... who was it got the first and biggest recontruction contract in iraq? ooooooh riiiiight haliburton... wonder what kinda kickback GW got from his buddy for that lil deal? [/QB][/QUOTE
I've allways stated watch the $$$ It's only an number but who is in control of it. Make an mess and use fear to control the people...

 

The wings folded back as the plane hit the ground in front of the building. Planes are notoriusly <sp> weak when subjected to any other forces than those they are designed for.

 

if the "plane" hit the ground how come theres no damage to the ground, or the spools of wire infront of where the impact was?

precision guided weapons arent 100% look at the incident where the US plane bombed the chinese embassy by accident, it didnt have to be a case of the US aiming a missile at the pentagon, as it could have been they fired at one of the planes, missed and just had HORRID luck in where the missile went after that

but lookin at the pics and video of where the plane should have gone,... there would have been something resembling a piece of a plane, there wasnt

 

Did you guys even take a look at the snopes link?

 

I read the whole thing about 3 times. While it makes good points, the video makes good points alos. It's like the Snopes link wants you to believe them and only them. I'm simply questioning them both and not taking either side for sure.

 

i trust the snopes link. Has anyone else seen the discovery channel show where it shows the renos to the pentagon? I would bet that it can have a plave go into it and the wings not damage it

 

I also trust the snopes link. snopes.com is a known urban legends site.. .. and that video.. No one knows where it came from.. [img]smile.gif[/img]