Sundown Vs. Other amps
05-13-2007, 08:48 PM
#1
Guest
Posts: n/a
Sundown Vs. Other amps
Seeing as how its such a big deal, Im willing to take an evening this week to test other amps VS. Sundown amps, I would like to see how they accually match up compared to others and then we can say for sure if the test results posted were BS or true.
05-13-2007, 08:57 PM
#2
this has got to be a joke.
there is nothing that stands up to the Downin of the Sun amplifers. I hear they are being banned in Db Drag as we speak for having way too much of an advantage over everything else that will possibly come out in the next 20 to 45 years.
i also heard on CNN that NASA and the National Association of Science and Research are working together on the biggest space, science and national defence project ever. They are integrating the latest Sundown components into the late model star wars defence misile which will be able to travel thru time at very low loads and destroy other planets with massive amounts of SPLzzzzzzzzzz.
dont say i didnt warn u kids.
PS. one DD Z1 vs. pair of 1500 soundownz - Z1 won by about 2.5 car lenghts. pair of those cant go as low as a single Z1, thus providing a Z1 with a massive advatage in power output at low ohm loads. Hmmm maybe NASA should have used DD components.
there is nothing that stands up to the Downin of the Sun amplifers. I hear they are being banned in Db Drag as we speak for having way too much of an advantage over everything else that will possibly come out in the next 20 to 45 years.
i also heard on CNN that NASA and the National Association of Science and Research are working together on the biggest space, science and national defence project ever. They are integrating the latest Sundown components into the late model star wars defence misile which will be able to travel thru time at very low loads and destroy other planets with massive amounts of SPLzzzzzzzzzz.
dont say i didnt warn u kids.
PS. one DD Z1 vs. pair of 1500 soundownz - Z1 won by about 2.5 car lenghts. pair of those cant go as low as a single Z1, thus providing a Z1 with a massive advatage in power output at low ohm loads. Hmmm maybe NASA should have used DD components.
Last edited by Prolifik; 05-13-2007 at 09:14 PM.
05-13-2007, 09:19 PM
#3
Guest
Posts: n/a
OH MAN...Funniest post ive read in a while. Congrats yuli, you my friend, are fried...LOL
05-13-2007, 09:23 PM
#4
Originally Posted by Prolifik
which will be able to travel thru time at very low loads
You should seriously do some head to head tests though C-Team, maybe on a weekend and I'll come back up to witness it
05-13-2007, 09:46 PM
#9
50 Watt CAFz'r
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 200
i thought NASA used sony amps? because of their super high max output rating they were a far better option in price vs performance
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
amangujral06
General Discussion
12
11-14-2007 12:10 PM
