anyone with serious box knowledge willing to help with box design?
#11
If you want to tune lower, make the port longer.
That's all there is to it.
Also, the bigger the box, the more output down low as well.
Fusion, dont expect much low end out of your setup, but it should go a pinch deeper than a sealed box, or at least have more meat in the 45-65hz range depending on your tuning.
That's all there is to it.
Also, the bigger the box, the more output down low as well.
Fusion, dont expect much low end out of your setup, but it should go a pinch deeper than a sealed box, or at least have more meat in the 45-65hz range depending on your tuning.
#12
Originally Posted by Sub Sonic
LOL...
they are still on dope
I have seen Rockford recommend the Powerfull enclosure for
all their new subs....one size fits all...
they are still on dope
I have seen Rockford recommend the Powerfull enclosure for
all their new subs....one size fits all...
Rockford purposely introduced that concept a number of years ago. They're theory is that someone can start out with an entry woofer and upgrade over time without having to change their enclosure. It was an alright idea.
#13
Originally Posted by Sub Sonic
don't **** around with those crappy free programs...
they are garbage
contact me thru my home page and I'll see what I can do
they are garbage
contact me thru my home page and I'll see what I can do
Another good program (sheet) is Unibox. Its a bit manual at first but once you find your way around it is very powerful.
Just because you pay a premium price for a program does not make it superior.
Best,
Mark
#14
In terms of Qtc calculations, WinISD doesn't seem to have realistic targets for losses (Ql) so Unibox tends to be a touch better for sealed alignments. I haven't really done much comparison between other enclosure types though.
The only real differences between programs is how well the user knows how to use them and what options are available to change. The primary issue with programs like WinISD is that in an effort to make their UI more friendly, some variables are a little more challenging or not as clearly emphasized. When it comes to predicting frequency response, it's really not a complicated issue: user inputs A, computer calculates and outputs B. As Mark indicated, all of the calculations are done utilizing well-defined equations that are very universal.
The only programs that will be radically different (assuming all things constant, which again, is up to the user) will be programs like LEAP or LspCAD that allow you to take boundaries and transfer function into account, in which case the models used for prediction don't quite have the empirical data to back them up yet.
The only real differences between programs is how well the user knows how to use them and what options are available to change. The primary issue with programs like WinISD is that in an effort to make their UI more friendly, some variables are a little more challenging or not as clearly emphasized. When it comes to predicting frequency response, it's really not a complicated issue: user inputs A, computer calculates and outputs B. As Mark indicated, all of the calculations are done utilizing well-defined equations that are very universal.
The only programs that will be radically different (assuming all things constant, which again, is up to the user) will be programs like LEAP or LspCAD that allow you to take boundaries and transfer function into account, in which case the models used for prediction don't quite have the empirical data to back them up yet.
Last edited by Ligeia; 05-26-2007 at 11:15 AM.
#15
Indeed. LspCAD would be the cat's meow if one could afford it. I should expand on my statement a bit - the comparisons I made were based on bass reflex designs, which are inherently more difficult to perfect.
In my experience, determining Ql in sealed designs is erroneous at best, and since the whole concept of sealed box design is so forgiving in nature, one can achieve what WinISD produces without factoring Ql by using good build practices.
Best,
Mark
In my experience, determining Ql in sealed designs is erroneous at best, and since the whole concept of sealed box design is so forgiving in nature, one can achieve what WinISD produces without factoring Ql by using good build practices.
Best,
Mark
#16
WinISD works..it is close on the tunning
but it lacks a few features for fine tunning an enclosure
I have built well over 1000 enclosures with WinISD,Bassbox pro exc.
and the last 40 or so I have done with Termpak have been
absolutley phenominal...
all due to the ease of the ability to play with the profile score
and the cool port velosity scale
I will never go back to another program
but it lacks a few features for fine tunning an enclosure
I have built well over 1000 enclosures with WinISD,Bassbox pro exc.
and the last 40 or so I have done with Termpak have been
absolutley phenominal...
all due to the ease of the ability to play with the profile score
and the cool port velosity scale
I will never go back to another program
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
PsychoAcoustics Canada
Canadian General Car Audio Discussion
0
07-07-2010 11:13 AM
Prolifik
Canadian General Car Audio Discussion
25
10-06-2007 08:59 PM
noo tribe
General Discussion
4
01-08-2004 12:43 PM